Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mayor Wm. Brad Van Nest Jul), 8, 1980 Page 7 states that the easements are a subdivision of the land, and since the City is now leaning toward accepting the lower court's decision that the easements are valid, then this proves beyond a reasonable doubt that we are, in fact dealing with subdivided land. The square foot- age of the easements must be calculated and deducted from the square feet cf the remaining lot at 1410 Bohns Point Road to determine the actual size of the lot. Furthermore, the ease- ments cannot be included in determining the set- backs from the f-ont and sides of the lot. In other words, Mr. Rhode must build ttn feet from the easement boundary, not ten feet from the lot boundary. Most importantly, it is nix ' con- tention that Mr. Rhode should not be allowed to build at all because of the fact that it is a multiple -use lct, it is a substandard lot, and is virtually an out lot. 9) The Council is ignoring the Code provision (Sec. 32.340) which states: "No variance shall be granted to which the use of the property is extended or changed beyond the use permitted in the Zrning Code." The property's intended use is single-family housing (one), whereas the lot is of use to two other families as a beach and dock area via granted easements. 10) Mr. Swenson stated that the fact that there are two people diiving ,over a segment of my property in order to get to t eir garages pro%ad that I have easements on my pruperty n therefore, that the easeml-nt-_on the Rhode property should not be an issue. First, I did not create these roadway easements -- they were created by Mr. Lauer who, at one time, owned all the property. These easements allow Mr. Lauer to get to his garage by driving over the westerly segment of my property, and allows Mr. Campion to reach his garage which is west of my property. (Mr. Campion has since built another driveway directly from North Shore Drive into his