My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bohns Point Road
>
1410 Bohns Point Road
>
Land Use
>
80-#546, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2026 11:03:58 AM
Creation date
2/26/2026 10:58:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 30, 1980 Page 25 <br />If Mr. Rhode insists on revising his house plan and VARIANCE <br />location from that approved in Resolution #851, then 1410 Bohns Point Rd. <br />I recommend and request Council direction to refer (Continued) <br />said new application to the Planning Commission for <br />formal, standard review. <br />Council Meeting - June 30 1980 <br />Present were: Jack Rhode, his attorney, James <br />Swenson, Jason Becker, and Gregg Hannah. <br />Mr. Swenson presented the City Council with a leteer <br />from the Lauers, who live next door to the Rhode <br />property, stating that they agreed with the location <br />of the proposed relccation of the house. <br />Mayor Van Nest stated that Mr. Jack Rhode has shown <br />us the same plat prepared by the Gary Gabriel <br />Land Surveyors showing the proposed Rhode residence <br />as drawn on April 15, 1980. The surveyor states that <br />this is the best area to place the house, which puts <br />the house in the center of the lot and will allow <br />an area for landscaping on either end of the lot <br />after the carriage house is removed. <br />Mr. Swenson reviewed Resolution #851 stating that <br />they would like Mr. Rhode to build without a <br />restricted covenant on the easements that was originally <br />included in the resolution. <br />He stated that he does not believe that the application <br />should be referred back to the Planning Commission <br />because the Planning Commission had already recom- <br />mended the buildability of the lot in relation to the <br />easements. <br />Mayor Van Nest stated that we are now being requested <br />to change the front setback line and that he has not <br />heard any hardship or reason for the change. This <br />change should be reviewed by the Planning Commission <br />to determine if there is a hardship or other reasons <br />for a change. He stated that the easement and dock use <br />area be negotiated by Mr. Rhode and the two easement <br />holders. <br />Mr. Jason Becker stated that he felt it vas unfair to <br />him to make any decision tonight due to the fact that <br />he has not had time to prepare a reply. Mr. Becker <br />stated that he felt due process is necessary to make <br />any changes, therefore, he felt that the new application <br />should be referred to the Planning Commission for review. <br />Butler felt that it was not necessary to be referred <br />to the Planning Commission because it is still a house <br />on a lot and she does not feel t.-lat it is a material <br />(Continued) <br />change. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.