Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br />II. Reason Why House Should Be Near Or On Carriage House Area: <br />1. October 22, 1974, variance granted by Council stated "no other <br />variances would be granted but width and lot size" <br />2. Lot just as wide in back (120' just in front of barn versus 107' <br />further forward) <br />3. Zoning Ordinance clear, not ambiguous, on setting house back of setback <br />line connecting house on either side <br />4. Rhode's original plan was to remodel carriage house. Thus, there is <br />no reason why he can't build on carriage house site or remodel <br />carriage house <br />5. Land where Rhode planning to build is lowest point on lot. Water collects <br />there when it rains. Rhode's architect says they want to build on nob <br />of hill Becker house is on. ire is -o nob on Rhode's lot. <br />fill wil, have to be brought .*n to create rise fo� le ho,cQ wn :h <br />i� proposed for low point of lot. This will cause drainage problems. <br />Where will fill to raise land come from? Character of lot will change. <br />Right now. land Rhode plans to build on about 15' lower than where my <br />house sets. <br />6. Tear;i; old carriage mouse clown (Lauer request) helps Lauer property <br />value because old building with broken windows close to Lauer h ase <br />eliminated. The further forward that node house is,the better it is <br />for Lauer's. The oser to Beci.er's house that Rhode's house is, the <br />.lore off the Beckers are. Lauer status not affected if Rhode house <br />built on 5,... )t' carriage hou: since structure already exists there. <br />