Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 I HUMS OF A P1-,V-,N I NG 01•1 I SS I DN'' 1•fliFF ING I i LD JX`;,1.-kRY 3, 1.977 - PAGE 4 Pesek moved, Woolley seconded, to approve on the basis that ILkRRISON JOI NSTM the Watershed District does not shown any disapproval, cluck (Continued) pond is confined within the French Lake marsh and this is (0202) not a new pond as duck Pc,nd existed previously. Motion - Ayes (4), Days (1) McDonald. Hannah moved, Pesek seconded, to table until we have further RIC1{ARD IJ:1)57'RCM word from the applicant. motion - I7es (5), Nays (0) . 3465 SIXTH AVIMiE N. *VIANDS VARIANCE CCNDI'1'IDNIAL USE PERMIT (#209) The Zoning Administrator advised that applicant had not sub- JACK MODE mitted new proposal. however, he informed the Commission that 1410 BOUNS PO WT ROAD the Lauer's had been in his office. The Zoning Administrator VARIANCE - LOT AREA 6 told the Lauer's that Mr. Rhode's attorney had stated at the WID1H AND SECOND DOCK December 20, 1976, meeting that the Lauer's had no objection CONDITIONAL USE PER41 to the proposed location of the house. The Lauer's did not (N210) concur with this. They were agreeable to a proposed lakeshore setback equal to the Becker residence. They were opposed to remodeling the old carriage house. ioolley moved, Pesek seconded, to table until revised roposal is submitted. Motion - Ayes (S), Nays (0). Planning Commission reviewed report submitted by the Zoning HI--MEPIN COUNTY VO-TEW Administrator covering the effects the proposed Vo-Tech 2950 SD(TH AVENUE N. School would have on Orono residents. W. Muhich stated (0126) that other staff members were also requested to report on the proposed location of this Vo-Tech School. These reports will be the basis for a.r resolution of denial. Planning Commisrion felt that the resolution dated December 13 should be redated to reflect that the reports were submitted prior to resolution. Zoning 4dministrator advised Commission that this proposal W. DRAKE'S GIFT PROPOSAL had been turned over to the Park Ccrronission for their 2 U7TS ACROSS FRM review aM recorrrnendation. We have not received any 2835 CASCO POINT ROAD fu.2her word from them. Planning Commission further discussed this Project. UPPER 1tiATERSIU=D SIXRAC;E Committee to meet again. PROWELT :tanning Crnrnission continued review. Mairfn:rn Hannah N.-%NNING W-MISSION fr 00ain reminded all mei+ers to submit in writing whether C"XMIL PROCESSING not they plan to continue to serve on the Planning PROCEDURES ec^vnission.