Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />1 iAiat aro the roquirevients of the ordinance sections listed in <br />Item 10? <br />MIN. LOT SIZE - 1 ACRE - 43,560 SO. FT. <br />MIN. LOT WIDTH - 140' <br />12. State oxact•ly whHL is intu►dod to be done on or with the <br />property which doos riot conform with oxirtingr regulations: <br />CONSTR. NEW HOME OR REMODEL 6 REFURBISH EXIST. GARAGE INTO DWELLING <br />TO MEET ALL STATE BLDG. CODES 6 LOCAL ZONING ORD, ON SUBSTANDARD <br />PARCEL OF 28,000 SO. FT. - 107 ' WIDE. <br />VARIANCES REQUESTED - TAT AREA - 14,440 SO. FT. LOT WIDTH - 33 FT. <br />13. Has an application for toning, variance on the raria property <br />been acted upon by the Village Council within the last six <br />month:? If co, state the ditto of t;lte Villrj;;o Council's action. <br />APPROVED OCTOBER 22, 1974 WITH CONDITIONS <br />e law requirn.i that t,hn condition.; set; rorth in the <br />t ol.Lowin;; Lhroc i t cm:: 1 it, 15, aiid 16 L;11 ;'P be u tabli.Thed <br />befo.-o a vnri:►►ice can hu t,rranLec'. r'.xplain in detail ter <br />each atatomont. whuroin yotij, cr1:: � conforms to the requirements. <br />I 1j. Difficultiun (i1' Itnrdchip to Uarn(_r. Strici. application of <br />L'ho proviaionj of tho lonit►o,, Or-dinunco wotild roL;ult in <br />porulini• and hrnct.icnt difCicull.1ca or exeoption"11 or undue <br />hardsliip upon tho owner of tho. leL in dovult.,pirf; or using; <br />such lot in a manner cuatomar-y and le0all,y nonriiscibie <br />within thu zoning, district io which paid lot is located. <br />Granting; of the variance ir: noceaaary for the, preservation <br />and enjoyriont: OV a aubntantial property right of the appli- <br />a:Cant and to alloviato demon:jtrablo Hardship or difficulty <br />and will not, moroly aorve raa a convenience to the applicant. <br />Explain in detail. <br />1. I PURCHASES THE PROPERTY PREDICATED ON THE FACT THAT IT COULD BE <br />BUILT ON. <br />2. IT HAS IN FACT BEEN PLATTED. <br />J. THIS LOT WAS PURCHASED AT A SUBSTANTIAL PRICE - WAS CLOSED ON MARCH <br />1975 AFTER THE APPORTAL WAS OBTAINED. <br />4. I WAS URGED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO PROCEED LAST YEAR WITH THE <br />APPLICATION, EVEN TNOUGH 16XPRSSS6D I MOULD NOT BUILD ON THS <br />PROPsitrr DujtING THE 12 MONTHS. AOTHEIR REASONIN(= WAS IT SET PRECSDENCE <br />FOR THS PROPERTY. <br />B. THE VILLAGE HAD NEVER DISAPPROVED AN <br />APPLICATION ONCS IT HAD BEEN APPROVED. <br />5. SB111Byt NA$ BSSN PUT IN. <br />