My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4166
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 4100 - 4199 (June 22, 1998 - November 23, 1998)
>
Resolution 4166
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2015 1:50:46 PM
Creation date
11/17/2015 1:50:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� °� . - <br /> • � � <br /> ��b. - CITY of ORONO - <br /> � � <br /> � �'ti RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> . �L�kESH�4��' � NO. 4 � � �+ <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 21, 1998 and <br /> recommended approval on a vote of 5 to 0. <br /> 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br /> A. . The previous garage was destroyed by fire. Variances are required to <br /> preserve a substantial interest in the property. <br /> B. The previous garage was 12' in height to the peak. Using storage trusses <br /> increases the height to 15'. <br /> C. The height of the new gaxage is less than the principal structure and <br /> conforms to the Zoning Code. <br /> D. The garage replacement at a height of 15' does not increase the amount <br /> of hardcover or increase the encroachment into the side yard. <br /> • E. The proposed garage will not have a negative impact on adjacent <br /> residential property. <br /> F. No negative comments were received during the public hearing. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> . . intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. � , <br /> � <br /> 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br /> and welfare of the community. <br /> • Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.