Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1110 <br />April 8, 1987 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />g) Variance to Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (A) - Dock on Smiths Bay <br />divided by County Road 1.5 cannot receive credit for principal <br />structure on opposite side of road. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit <br />A <br />- Application <br />Exhibit <br />B - <br />Plat Map <br />Exhibit <br />C - <br />Property Owners List <br />Exhibit <br />D - <br />Hardcover Anaylsis <br />Exhibit <br />E - <br />Site Plan <br />Exhibit <br />F <br />- Plan of Hardcover Analysis <br />Exhibit <br />G <br />- South Elevations <br />Exhibit <br />H - <br />North Elevations <br />Exhibit <br />I - <br />Floor Plan - First Floor <br />Exhibit <br />J - <br />Floor Plan - Second Floor <br />Exhibit <br />K - <br />Staff Sketch <br />Exhibit <br />1, - <br />S-P Testing Tnc. Letter of 3/24/87 <br />The applicant seeks multiple variances to construct a new residence on <br />an undeveloped ripar4:in lot. Riparian access to the lake will be on Smiths <br />Bay. The applicant be advised that a dock (accessory structure) <br />cannot be constructed on the lakeshore portion of his property until a <br />certificate of occupancy is issued for principal residence. <br />A the lot widl_h and area var::-ances, staff has little concern. <br />The lc. similar to the adjacent developed lots within Auditors <br />Subdivi 3. 356. The lot is certainly larger than Lhe developed 1 acre. <br />lots 4n surrounding Fox Hill Subdivision. There are no apparent <br />physical Tres or recorded concerns for the property that would inhibit <br />the devel,,, ,,,t of the property. <br />Acce,s to the property will be via a City road, Heritage Drive, <br />requiring approval by the Public Works Department. The sharp vertical <br />elevations to the rear lut of along Heritage Drive may create a need for <br />retaining walls but staff sees no major sighting problems at the southern <br />edge of the lot line where access drive is proposed. <br />A conditional use permit is required for all proposed accessory <br />structu•-es. The dpck tennis court meets all required setbacks but the pool <br />and portions of ' woos :!n deck encroach beyond the average setback line. <br />The applicant nott--. that the location of several mature trees provides a <br />natural placement for the house. The pool is located to the front or, <br />lakeside to net the bast advantage of Iirect sunlight. The pool structure <br />wi l l not create a view i,arrier. Sui ldinq elevations conf i.rm the proposed <br />deck is at grado (Fxhit,it G). <br />