Laserfiche WebLink
connection of this frontage road across Daniel Street <br />as an issue they would like to address. Orono stands <br />open for discussion on this matter. ..a the primary goal <br />for Orono is to eliminate direct access on Hwy 12 <br />together with an intercorridor accens point south of Hwy <br />12, north of the railroad between Willow and Old Crystal <br />Bay. <br />C. Water Service - The presentation by the City <br />Engineer £'or-Eong Sake indicated that they would discuss <br />the issue of water service with the City. It was <br />indicated that in addition to extension being at <br />developers cost, there may be accompanying connection <br />charges. <br />D. Sewer - Currently Long Lake feels that there is <br />concern regarding the amount of allocation they have <br />together with the "firmness" of the numbers that Orono <br />is working with regarding the expansion. As has <br />previously been indicated during the study and also at <br />the Planning Commission public hearings that the number <br />of units that are increased will be based on negotiation <br />between the 3 cities in the agreement and the attendant <br />cost of expansion. Given that any zoning to be achieved <br />in this corridor must demonstrate adequate capacity, it <br />is not an issue that can be fully addressed at this <br />point. <br />Once the Council has considered it both at March 30 and <br />also at the April 27, 1987 and should they desire to give their <br />preliminary approval it may be appropriate that the Orono Council <br />and the Long Lake Council establish a special joint meeting to <br />discuss this issue together wth other issues of common interest <br />including f;.re and police service etc. <br />RECOMM ".uA:IO_N - It is recommended that the Council hear all <br />comments that va r. pus groups may hat_ regarding this plan done on <br />an area by area basis commencing with the areas of minimal change <br />and then going un to the area6 where changes suggested leaving <br />discussion on area 4 until the meeting on April 27, 1987. <br />In addition the staff would recommend the document include <br />mention of a trails plan as noted in Attachment E. It was the <br />intent that this be originally included but it was an oversight <br />In the drafting of the plan. At present a specific graphic <br />layout is not appropriate as it should blend with the eventual <br />-d plan. <br />finning Commission did indi_ate that in the discussion of <br />housing On page 61 that the tero non-traditional single family <br />housing be used rather than mul•i-family development because of <br />contentations Chit ay carry with it is it relates to apartments. <br />PROPOSEn MOTION - Moved by ls-conded by , that the Council <br />accept informatior. regard i ng Comprehens i ve—Plan Amendment and <br />