My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-30-1987 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1987
>
03-30-1987 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2026 12:57:44 PM
Creation date
2/23/2026 12:54:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The second option, which is relevant, is that y Pepin County might <br />provide the immediate purchase price through using t unexpended balance <br />from the discretionary account as related to the Cemunity Develomient <br />Block Grant Funds. <br />DMPDIIDED OPTIONS: These apply only to the acquisition of the building or <br />facility as such. The first of these has already been explored with one <br />corporation; it involves the corporation turning over the building for a <br />nominal sows and taking the tax write-off. A second option is the <br />outright gift of a building by an individual or corporation. A third <br />option is that HERD takes possession of a building for a five year period <br />at nominal cost, with an option to buy in the future. Obviously, an <br />unfunded option has relevance for this iniative since it allows focus on <br />the much more modest budgets related to modification ardor renovation, <br />and critically the operating budget. It is intended to preservere with <br />these options. However, the unfunded options represent, in combination, <br />only about a ten percent possibility. <br />MONEY TO MODIFY A FACILITY: The first option is that the money will case <br />from a start-up grant from the Minnesota Department of Energy and <br />Development. This is difficult to reference except in relationship to a <br />specific building, but it is estimated not to exceed one hundred thousand <br />dollars. The second option is that this money will come from a grant <br />from the Federal Economic Development Administration. This second <br />approach requires the active support of _oth the Minnesota Detiartment of <br />End and Developmnt and the Minnesota Demrtment of Toby a^2 Tr inn nn, <br />MONEY TO START-UP THE FACILITY: The first option is to seek start-up <br />monies in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars from again the <br />Minnesota Department of Energy and Development and/or the Federal <br />Economic Development Administration. The attached pro forma budget <br />assumes that almost twenty-five thousand dollars will be lost in the <br />first year of operation, but in subsequent years the operation will show <br />a positive deviation in excess of thirty thousand dollars in 188, '89 and <br />'90 and be self-supporting thereafter. The money sought is therefore <br />seed money only. <br />In terms of start-up monies, it is important that contingencies be <br />ca,ered by the seed money granted to HERO since it is planned as set <br />fourth in the budget pro forms for the initiative 'o be self-supporting <br />after the second year. <br />Business Plan: Hero 1/15/67:RSA:05 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.