My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-30-1987 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1987
>
03-30-1987 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2026 12:57:44 PM
Creation date
2/23/2026 12:54:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File t1121 <br />March 20, 1957 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Planning Commission recommended denial of the aver •.ge setback <br />variance, on the basis that a) the house can be moved back to meet the <br />average setback requirement, hence there s no hardship; and b) the <br />neighbor's have not constructed an addition, and Planning Commission is not <br />comfortable basing decisions on speculative future actions by neighboring <br />property owners. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Staff would request that Council consider the intent of the average <br />lakeshore setback requirement. <br />Staff feels the intent is to preserve the character of a lakeshore <br />neighborhood and specifically to ensure that if the majority of houses are <br />substantially in line with each other, that a new one could not be placed <br />where it would significantly detract from the visual aesthetics of the <br />neighborhood, nor could it block adjacent owner's existing views of the <br />lake. <br />Staff suggests that the applicant's proposed residence is very <br />appropriate aesthetically for the neighborhood, and will not have a <br />significant effect on neighbor's views. In fact, if applicant omitted the <br />decks and enclosed porch and moved the house up to the average setback line <br />and over to the 10' east side setback line, his house would (without the <br />need for a variance) create a more significant view encroachment than is <br />proposed. <br />The proposed deck and porch is behind the front line of the house to <br />the west. The applicant has the right to place the house in a location <br />where it would have a more significant effect on the side views of the <br />easterly neighbor, but he chose the current proposal as more appropriate, <br />creating less of an impact on the neighbor but technically requiring a <br />variance to accomplish. <br />Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance as <br />proposed by applicant. <br />A resolution for approval of the lot width variance, hardcover <br />variance (28% in the 75-250' zone), and average lakeshore setback variance <br />(encroachment of V ) is attached for council review. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.