My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4179
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 4100 - 4199 (June 22, 1998 - November 23, 1998)
>
Resolution 4179
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:23 PM
Creation date
11/17/2015 1:46:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
g. <br /> 0 0 <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> kt5:1-- 4, 1 <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> 4 1 <br /> 9kESHOg NO. <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2418. <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1B, One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning <br /> District. <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 21, 1998, and <br /> recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0. <br /> 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br /> A. The lot meets size and yard setback requirements. <br /> B. The zoning lot is located on a peninsula and is irregular in shape. <br /> C. Variances were previously granted for hardcover and average lakeshore <br /> setback. <br /> 5. The City Council denied the applicant's request on September 28, 1998, but due <br /> to not receiving complete information to base a decision upon, the applcation <br /> was opened for reconsideration on October 12, 1998. <br /> 6. Property owners acknowledge that the proposed plan does not include outdoor <br /> patios or decks. It is the intent of the City Council that future requests for <br /> additional hardcover would not be looked upon favorably. <br /> 7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.