Laserfiche WebLink
. . <br />• 1t .... .. ' . . . . . . . . <br />., • . . . ' • >-~ • • ~ ""'.' • • • ' ·_' . • ., . <br />;,; . ,(, . ' .. . <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2004 <br />8. At that same meeting the Orono City Coun~il directed staff to <br />prepare a resolution of approval for Applications 991 and 1018 <br />and to include the following findings in that resolution: <br />A) The alterations proposed in the lagoon area {Area 1) <br />involved no major changes in elevations o~ in local <br />drainage. This tn,e of filling is typical where new ground <br />cover is tu be installed. Applicant maintained adequate <br />erosion control thoughout entire restoration. <br />B) The alterations proposed within 75 feet of the lake to <br />permit the installation of the foundation ground water. <br />drainfield as proposed in plan by Marks. Gronberg referred <br />to ar Drain Tile Details (Area 2) and as amended by Glenn <br />Cook4report dated June 2, 1986 is found to be superior to <br />drainage allowed to surface on ground to collect sediment, <br />fertilizers and other debris. <br />C) The berming along Bohn's Point Road right-of-wa:y (Area <br />3) &3 approved by Council will be consistent with the height <br />of all allowed man-made improvements along the street lot <br />line of lakeshore lots adjacent to minor thoroughfares and <br />such improvement would be consistent with the intent and <br />guidelines for all development within lakeshore residential <br />districts. <br />D) The filling within the corxidor along the shared lot <br />line of the property (Area 4) provides more uniform or <br />flatter grades providing a more suitable treatment area for <br />surface drainage rather than the more extreme elevations <br />approved at the time the building permit was approved. 'l'h~ <br />east 1/3 of the property now drains to a pond before <br />entering the main lake. <br />9. 'l'he City Council finds that the conditions existin9 on this <br />property are pecuiiar to it and do not apply generally to other <br />property in this zoning district, that granting the varia~cea <br />would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, ftir nor <br />poee a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; <br />would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br />necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty, in <br />necessary to preaerve a subatantial property right of the <br />applicant; and would be in keeping with the epirit and intent of <br />the Zoning Coda and Coap~ehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />_..,,·,, ....