Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 21, 2014 <br />6:30 o'ciock p.m. <br />nat~ral ·and n6tcontriv~~~The Pl~~hing Co~~ission sH;uld als,e(determi~;\vhetheldr not th~:uggeste,i <br />building'pacis wifl,acG~mmodate'honies at an elevation and. with a f6,un_d~tion styk'~hi¢h is/com~atibll ,. <br />-~, ,!• '1/. "j,¼., ~l' ' /. \ I \, ' / }1,_~$ ~• f' ~, ' i. / (> with the adjacent properties. ,.,.. ,... •, ._.-' ·,.,_, •·· •,,,.../ ·:, ,./: ; <br />The subject property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area and sewer service is available <br />to these properties. There are two existing sewer stubs currently serving the property and are aligned in <br />such a way that each of the proposed lots can utilize the existing stubs. <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the subdivision. <br />Schoenzeit asked what the grade change is in feet. <br />Curtis indicated Exhibit C shows the cross-section. Curtis stated on the south lot along the swale, the pre- <br />existing home on the property was quite large and it is not known what the grades were prior to <br />construction of that home. <br />Schwingler asked if the Planning Commission has reviewed this application previously. <br />Curtis indicated it has but that the approval has expired. <br />McGrann asked if any public comments have been received on this application. <br />Curtis indicated Staff has not received any. <br />George Stickney, Applicant, stated he was asked by the sellers to develop this land. The property owner <br />appeared before the Planning Commission previously for a three lot subdivision. The property owner <br />never finalized their plans and never filed the final plat. <br />Stickney stated the lagoon is unique, and with it being split, it made it almost impossible to market. <br />Stickney stated in his view, if they doubled the size of the lot, it would be in keeping with the area and <br />would allow for one lot to have the whole lagoon. <br />Stickney indicated he has attempted to put the grades together to blend in with the adjoining properties <br />and allow for a small walkout on each of the lots. Stickney stated in his view the lots are oversized <br />enough to allow for some leeway on the grading and building pad. Stickney noted this is a one acre <br />zoning area and both lots are over two acres. Stickney stated drainage should not affect either adjoining <br />property and that he has not heard any negative comments from the neighbors. <br />Land graver asked if any of the neighbors have asked to see the plat. <br />Stickney indicated they have not but they do know what is being proposed. <br />Schwingler commented the application is pretty straight forward. <br />Acting Chair Landgraver opened the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Page llof 26