Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JANUARY 9, 1979 Page 7 <br />Mr. Paul r. Clabo was present and presented the VARIANCE <br />City Council with a letter dated January 9, 1979 1388 Park Drive <br />concerning his request- for a variance at 1388 Parr #438 <br />Drive. Paul C. Clabo <br />After discussion, <br />*'aurus moved, Butler seconded, to table the request <br />^f Paul Clabo for a variance at 1388 Park Drive <br />until staff and the City Attorney have reviewed the <br />letter presented by Mr. Clabo. Motion, Ayes (4) - <br />Nays (0) . <br />Mr. Alan Olson, City Planner, informed the City <br />STREET VACATIONS <br />Council the request bky the Hennepin County Park <br />Big Island <br />Reserve District for street vacations on Big Island. <br />#444 <br />Henn. County Park <br />This application is made to vacate all of the public <br />roads in an area of the west island which is now <br />owned by the Park Reserve. The area is platted <br />into ten separated lots which are divided by the <br />subject roads. The Park Reserve's intentions are <br />to have the roads vacated to permit combination of <br />the lots into one buildable/3aleable lot. <br />Planning Commission Meeting - December 11, 1978 <br />Planning Commission recommended approval of the <br />vacations of undeveloped roads on Big Island, legally <br />described as follows: All of Linden Street, all <br />of Elm Street, and all of Maple Place located <br />within Kate B. Plummer's Subdivision of Lot 2 of <br />Kitchel's Subdivision of Government Lots 5 & 6. Such <br />vacation to be approved without relocation of the <br />public right of way based on the following findings: <br />1. <br />The <br />vacation does not affect access to or use <br />of <br />any affected or adjoining property. <br />2. <br />The <br />City has not and does not intend to develop, <br />improve <br />or use the property in any way. <br />3. <br />The <br />property as it exists serves no public <br />purpose. <br />4� <br />The <br />vacation is in the public interest by: <br />a. <br />furthering the pens of the Park Reserve <br />District <br />b. <br />reducing City liability for r.tintenance <br />C. <br />increasing taxable valuation <br />5. <br />The <br />Supreme Court ruling applies to access to <br />the <br />lake which is not applicable in this factual <br />case. <br />The only members of the public needing <br />access <br />are the three affected property owners <br />who <br />each have independent access available. <br />(Continued) <br />Reseii <br />