My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-1987 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1987
>
02-23-1987 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2026 2:51:37 PM
Creation date
2/9/2026 2:39:29 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning Pile #1059 <br />September 17, 1986 <br />Page 7 <br />The majority of the Planning Commission voted denial of the <br />conditional use permit (fog duplex use) (originally accepted by <br />staff as a possible cor, ;,uation of a non -conforming use - deemed <br />less intense of use than the previous mixed <br />commercial/residential u3es,. A review of the records on this <br />property revealed no evidence to support a position that the <br />duplex use was deemed less intense than the mixed <br />commercial/residential. The majority opinion felt each permit by <br />the City issued to the applicant clearly advised the second <br />apartment was for non -rental use although a conditional use <br />permit for the ndn-rental apartment was never required in 1976. <br />Please review Exhibit V. the minutes that contain the specific <br />recommendation of the Planning Commission. <br />Alternatives of Council .'lction: <br />A) To deny the Bjork application for a conditional use <br />permit for duplex credit and to grant a conditic I use <br />permit for a non -rental apartment unit subject co the <br />following conditions: <br />1. The owner working with both the Hennepin County <br />Highway Department and the Orono staff in establishing <br />a permanent, safe curb cut to the site; <br />2. Removal of detached accessory structure in reE <br />yard that is in a state of disrepair. <br />Direct staff to draft a resolution with appropriate findings <br />for action at your meeting of October 1.3'.h. <br />B) To direct staf :o draft a resolution of approval for a <br />ccndit nal use pe,.,,.it for a duplex based on resolve of the <br />following issues: <br />1. City Attorney t:, opine if granting a duplex credit <br />for this property constitutes a use variance or merely <br />- variance to a performance standard of Section 10.20, <br />•ubd-ision 3 (I) - If th is considered a use <br />variant. _ she app' J ^a+.L n wi be returned for further <br />Council Pcti(n a: r OcL-der 13th meeting. <br />2. Building Deparr.went to evaluate exist q structure <br />in regard to building code standards for l�_,aI duplex. <br />a) need for intepent water meteZs <br />b) separate hook-ups to sewer for each units; <br />c ) second f 1 oo r t mr,nt must be brought upto <br />building code stanu,. -ris ; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.