Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 27, 2003 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />*11. #03-2952 GREG TRIPP, 3229C CASCO CIRCLE, VARIANCE - <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5067 <br />1\-Iurphy moved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5067, a Resolution <br />granting Average Lakeshore Setback, Hardcover, and Lake Setback Variances to <br />change the roofline and pitch of the roof, add dormers, and improve the overall <br />design aesthetically, subject to the removal of the 128 s.f. wooden stairs on the south <br />side of the home and any plastic/fabric liner from the planting/rock beds on the <br />property located at 3229-C Casco Circle. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />12. #03-2954 HO\VARD R. ALTON, III, 1635 CONCORDIA STREET, VARIANCE <br />As the applicants were not present, the Council tabled the application for later discussion: <br />Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to table Application #03-2954, Howard R. Alton <br />III, 1635 Concordia Street, for later discussion. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />*13. #03-2955 MICHAEL PALM, 710 BIG ISLAND, VARIANCE -RESOLUTION <br />NO. 5068 <br />. Murphy moved, \Vhite seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5068, a Resolution <br />approving the average lakeshore setback and lot area variances to allow construction <br />of a 3-season cabin at 710 Big Island. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />*14. #03-2956 HOSSNPAT CONSTRUCTION, 849 BROWN ROAD NORTH, <br />VARIAN CE -RESOLUTION NO. 5069 <br />Murphy moved, \Vhite seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5069, a Resolution <br />granting a 68' encroachment on the average lakeshore setback to allow the <br />co~struction of a new home at 849 Brown Road North. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0 .. <br />15.03-2957 JOSEPH THIES, 1180 \VILLOW DRIVE NORTH, VARIANCE- <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5070 <br />Waataja explained that the applicant requests the following v~riances to construct an <br />addition to the home and a detached garage: <br />1. Rear yard setback variance to allow an attached garage and house addition to be setback <br />32 feet when 50 feet is required. <br />2. Rear yard setback variance to allow a deck to be setback 24 feet from the rear property <br />line when 50 feet is required. · <br />3. Rear yard setback variance to allow a detached garage to be setback 5 feet from the rear <br />property line when 10 feet is required. <br />In summary, W aataj a indicated that the Planning Commission concurred with staffs <br />recommendation on a 4/1 vote to: · <br />PAGE 9 of 16