My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#03-2955 Expired Resolution 5068
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Big Island
>
710 Big Island - 22-117-23-24-0009
>
Land Use
>
03-2955, VAR
>
#03-2955 Expired Resolution 5068
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2026 11:56:19 AM
Creation date
2/5/2026 11:56:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 5 0 6 8 <br />3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br />held on October 20, 2003 and recommended approval of the average <br />lakeshore setback and lot area variances based on the following findings: <br />a. The lot is situated on a point which causes the entire lot to sit in front <br />of the average lakeshore setback. <br />b. The lot is a legal lot of record and was granted legal buildable status in <br />1983 as Record Lot No. 13. The lot is 2.9 acres in size located in a 5 <br />acre zoning district. <br />c. A structure has existed on the lot in the past. <br />d. A structure could not be constructed on the lot without an average <br />lakeshore setback and lot area variance. <br />e. A structure can be built on the lot meeting all other pertinent code <br />requirements. <br />4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br />and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br />comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br />variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are <br />peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br />district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic <br />conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring <br />property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is <br />necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br />preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in <br />keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive <br />Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.