My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4461
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 4400 - 4499 (December 13, 1999 - July 10, 2000)
>
Resolution 4461
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2015 12:35:50 PM
Creation date
11/17/2015 12:35:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
/� ��' <br /> � � 0 <br /> ��b. - CITY of ORONO <br /> � � � <br /> �� �'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL . <br /> ��kESH�4� NO. � � 6 1 <br /> � � <br /> A. Locating the pool on the lakeside of the properry screens the structure <br /> from view from the road. " <br /> B. A group of mature trees are located around the area designated for the <br /> swimming pool and the area is lower than adjacent properties for <br /> minimal impact and screening to surrounding residences. � <br /> C. The pool is located approximately 150 feet from the nearest adjacent <br /> residence. If the pool were relocated to the north side of the property the <br /> pool would be visible and within 60 feet of the residence. <br /> ' D. The City On-Site Systems Manager has approved a variance to the Septic <br /> Code that would permit an alternate septic site to be within 75 feet of <br /> an adjacent water supply well, but not less than the State requirement of <br /> � 50 feet. � <br /> E. The property owner of 520 North Arm Drive has submitted a letter to the <br /> City of Orono stating knowledge of the variance to permit a septic site <br /> within 75 feet of the well. � <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other properiy in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> � demonstrable hazdship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> � property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> , 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> � � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.