02-09-1987 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I C, f ,i� MEETING To: James Grabek, Mayor fC3 3 487 Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members UiY OF ORONO From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: February 2, 1987 Subject: 41096 John Vogt and Mike Hilbelink, 95/175 Watertown Road - Subdivision - Public Hearing Application - Subdivision - Class III - Plat of 6 lots served by new private road designated as outlet. Zoning District - RR-1B Total Acreage - 14.86 dry contiguous acres Density Ratio - 1 unit per 2.25 acres List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Easement/Covenant for Private Road Exhibit E - Drainage Sketch Exhibit F - Applicant's Letter of 1/28/87 Exhibit G - Engineer's Report Exhibit H - Temporary Construction asement Exhibit I - Preliminary Plat The subdivision involves the replat of Lots 2 and 3, Peterman Addition, approval date by the City 11/10/86. The new proposal involves the creation of 4 additional lots with total development at 6 lots. Each lot satisfies the area and width standards. There are no existing structures on the property. In creating the private road, a variance to the required public road frontage for each lot must be granted. The City will require that all accesses be via the private road with no direct access for Lot 1 on Watertown Road. Gaffron reports that all lots meet the standards of the on - site septic code finding suitable area for principal and alternate septic sites on each of the proposed lots. The proposed septic designs would appear in preliminary review to also conform to required standards based on findings of percolation tests, depth of mottling and ground elevations. In the City Engineer's report, (Exhibit G), Cook calls attention to the elevations along the west lot line of the plat. He recommends that a drainage ditch be installed along the west lot lines of Lots 1 and 2 is order to prevent drainage from the development to drain into adjacent property. Cook asks that the drainage ditch be defined along Lots ' and 2 prior to lot development and that as lots to the north are developed any drainage to west be channeled to drainage ditch aluag west lot lines. He sees no need to increase the custom-iy 10 feet wide easement.