02-09-1987 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

To: Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning 6 Zoning Administrator Date: October 15, 1986 Subject: 41060 J.F. Fleischhacker, 2775 Shadywood Road - Variance - Second Review Additional Exhibits - Revised Deck Plan - Revised Deck Plan With Staff Notations - Letter of Explanation Discussion: Mr. Fleischhacker has revi his deck plans as directed by the Planning Commission at your August meeting. Original Propcsal Revised Proposal 75' Setback Encroachment 20' 9.5' Avg. Setback Encroachment 10, 0' 0-75' Existing Hardcover (10 s.f. or 0.1%) 0-75' Proposed 276 s.f. (3.78) 177 s.f. (2.48) 75-250' Existing (6,253 s.f. or 38.1%) 75-250' Proposed 6,268 s.f. (38.1%) 6,275 s.f. (38.2%) As you can see from the numbers and the drawing provided, the magnitude of encroachment into the 75' zone has been reduced substantially. The wide dash line shows the original proposal. (Note that staff's numbers reflect the 75' setback line a little bit nearer the horse than the applicant's representation, based on the survey.) Staff Rec�wnendation: The hardcover numbers include all of the decking, hence if a variance is granted for the revised proposal, staff recommends that the variance include the decks as hardcover. Mr. Fleischhacker expressed a concern about the +S" spacing related to walking on it with spike high heels. Staff suggests he reduce the spacing to 1/4" but use more,narrower boards to maintain the maximum 12:1 board -to -space ratio, i.e. use 3" boards with 1/4" spacing, or 2" boards with 1/6" spacing (if a variance is granted for the hardcover, then the spacing won't be a factor - especially since most of the deck is over concrete patio anyway). if Planning Commission feels that the revised deck proposal is justified given the facts presented, then a recommendation for arproval would be in order, making findings supportive of the recommendation. _/