My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-1987 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1987
>
02-09-1987 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2026 1:29:35 PM
Creation date
2/3/2026 1:22:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
670
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
use problems since the bay has direct access to the sea, and unlimited boating <br />area. The major approach is shoreland management within existing authorities. <br />Other lakes discussed in California were Clear Lake and Lake Tahoe. Neither <br />had problems or conditions remotely similar to Lake Minnetonka. <br />Testae <br />Interest centered on several large reservoirs in the Dallas -Port Worth <br />metroplex and on Lake Austin. <br />The reservoirs (e.g., Lake Ray Hubbard, Lewisville Lake, Grapevine Lake) are <br />covered by general plans done when they were created. These plans have been <br />modified over time to increase use on public lands owned along these reser- <br />voirs. Little has been done to plan the details of land use around these reser- <br />voirs; the actual development pressure has not occurred yet. In most cases, <br />public land was secured as part of the initial development. <br />Lake Austin, also a reservoir, is in a different situation. The city of Austin <br />is growing rapidly, and the city's park and recreation department has begun <br />planning for the lake. Additional public land is being considered along the <br />roughly ten -square mile lake extending northwest along the Colorado River from <br />the west edge of town. Public access, surface use regulation and shoreland de- <br />velopment controls are being considered. Although the lake extend- a good dis- <br />tanca outside the mein portion of the city, its shoreline is almost all within <br />the statutory city limits. Private development is increasing rapidly. <br />However, the plan is only in its initial states and is a pioneering effort in <br />Texas. <br />Michigan <br />While Michigan is much like Minnesota in water resources, the presence of the <br />Great Lakes and the absence of large inland water bodies make the situation in- <br />comparable wt'h Minnesota. The regulatory mechanism used to deal with surface <br />use and shorelao. 'welopeent are quite similar to those used no other small <br />Minnesota Lakes. ' `,nal planning is done for the Great Lakes under the <br />Federal Coastal Zone -ment Act and its state counterpart. However, noth- <br />ing- remotely similar to Minnetonka was discovered. <br />Washington <br />Lake Washington, a 35-square mile .reshwater lake in the City of Seattle, was <br />researched. There has been l:ttle done it terms of surface use ?launing here <br />since the lake connects to Puget Sound. The major planning effort has involved <br />the shoreline Where environmental, aesthetic, and commercial -industrial - <br />recreational conflicts exist. No overall plan for the lake has been attempted <br />by the city of the Puget Sound Council of Governments. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.