Laserfiche WebLink
City of ORONO <br />' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br />PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR <br />A PLAT AT 1380 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH <br />APPLICATION NO. 1093 <br />WHEREAS, P 6 A Investment or. October 24, 1986 filed a formal <br />subdivision application with the City for approval of a four -lot <br />residential plat of property legally described as: <br />That part of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 26, <br />Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying North <br />of the center line of County Road No. 6 and lying west of a line <br />parallel with and 512.00 feet East of the West line of said East <br />1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 as measured at right angles to said West <br />line; EXCEPT the North 410.2 feet of said East 1/2 of the <br />Southwest 1/4 as measured at right angles to and parallel with <br />the North line thereof, (hereinafter "property"); and <br />WHEREAS, after duv published and mailed notice in accordance <br />with Minnesota Statues 462.358 at. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning <br />and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public <br />hear: on November 17, 1986, at which time all persons desiring to be <br />heard . cerning this application were given the opportunity to speak <br />thereon; and <br />WHRRRAS, at their regular meeting held on January 12, 19870 <br />the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of P a A <br />Investments, noting the following findings of fact: <br />1. The property is located within the RR-lB Single Family Rural <br />Residential +oning district requiring a minimum of 2 acres of <br />contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. <br />2. The property contains a total of approximately 9.75 acres, <br />all of which is considered dry buildable. <br />3. -',a proposed plat contains four lots each exceeding the 2.0 <br />acre minimum lot area requirement. <br />4. Proposed Lots 1 and 3 require a variance because they do not <br />have the required frontage on a public roadway. <br />S. All four lots are proposed to front on and access to 4 <br />private roa-2. Lots 2 and 3 abut the proposed private cul-de-sac <br />but require a variance to the 200' lot width requirement as <br />measured at the rear of the 50'front yard abutting the cul-de- <br />sac. <br />Page 1 of 5 <br />