Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THI: REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEI•:TING IIELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 <br />01064 CITY Or ORONC CONTINUED <br />It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by <br />Counc?Imem bef A6,ims, to adopt Resolution #2076 as <br />amended. Motion, "_yes 4, Nays 1. Councilmember <br />Callahan voted nay. <br />01070 RICHARD RINEIiART* <br />985 OLD LONG LAKE BOULEVARD <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION 02077 <br />It was moved by Councilmember Frr.hm, seconded by <br />Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2077 granting <br />a variance to permit the construction of an attached <br />garage to be located 0.6 feet frori. the side lot line. <br />Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />1141076,/LARD KRUEGER <br />20'5=215 HOLLANDER ROAD <br />LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT <br />FINAL RESOLUTION <br />Ward Krueger was not present for this matter. <br />City Administrator. Bernhardson explained the request for <br />a lot line rearrangement which would make the building <br />sites in more with the current zoning code. It would <br />require a lot width variance on tract 3 and variance for <br />f-ontage on a public street on tracts 1 & 3, however, <br />staff feels that would be appropriate as they improve on <br />the present subdivision. He noted that Mr. Krueger is <br />not the fee owner of the property involved and asked <br />City Attorney Blatz to address this issue. <br />City Attorney Blatz stated that the variance application <br />requests the owners name and signature. In this case, <br />Mr. Krueger noted that he was the owner of this <br />property, where in fact, the holder of the contract for <br />deed is not the fee owner. She recommended that the <br />actual owner be involved in the proceedings and that the <br />Council not take action on this application at tb4s <br />time. <br />Present for this matter were John Hollander, a <br />representative of the estate, and Mark A. Rurik, <br />attorney for the estate. <br />Mr. Rurik stated that Mr. Krueger ispurportedly <br />purchasing the property pursuant contract for deed, of <br />which two of the lots are currently subject to the <br />contract for deed. Ile noted that Mr. Krueger has <br />defaulted in the balloon payment that was due October <br />1st, and therefore fee simply ownership is vested in the <br />estate and no'_ in Mr. Krueger at this time. Therefore, <br />he proposed that the Council table this matter at this <br />5 <br />