My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-12-1987 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1987
>
01-12-1987 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2026 10:23:39 AM
Creation date
2/2/2026 10:14:02 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r- k,4,7 K <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986 <br />#1048/#1049 WASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC CONTINUED <br />Regarding the application for a variance and conditional <br />use permit to construct the building, Mr. Unger stated <br />that the bui ldin,• i.-- Y+ t due to a PCA inspection <br />requiring adequate stoi._age their chemicals. <br />There were no other comments from the public regarding <br />this matter and the Public Hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Keiley, seconded by McDonald, <br />to reconmenC approval per staff recommendation subject <br />to WSI submitting a statement from the Board Meeting <br />approving the installation of a sprinkling system prior <br />to the September 8th Council meeting when the Council <br />will review this application. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />1059 MARGARET WORK <br />`Z5TSHADYWOOD I.' T) <br />CONDITIONAL USE %IT <br />PUBLIC HEARING -- 8:37 <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />was noted. <br />Representing the :_i.,plicant were Don Bjerk, applicant's <br />son, and their real estate agent, Ruthanr.e Lang. <br />Applicant rt-,,,aests a conditional use permit to permit <br />the property at 2259 Shadywood Road to be used as 2 <br />residential units (duplex) in light of the unique <br />history of use of the property Applicant wishes to <br />sell this property as she can no longer maintain it. <br />Zoring Administrator Mabusth reviewed the floor plan <br />which indicate that theiz are two separate living units <br />with separate entries. She noted that the two building <br />permits dated in 1976 and 1980 which were issued to <br />remodel the house for a mother-in-law apartment both <br />specifically note that it is not to be used as a duplex <br />or for rental income. Today, it is obviously being used <br />as a duplex use. <br />Don Bjork explained the history of the property and <br />the change of his families circumstances. He noted how <br />his family had improved the property. He stated that <br />this house is definitely now a duplex, which the City <br />help to create, and there is a hardship being they <br />cannot sell the property unless it is granted a duplex <br />use by the City. He asks that the City realize what is <br />actually there and help them with thi., bad situation. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that staff finds no <br />we.y to make this property -i legal non -conforming use. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.