Laserfiche WebLink
� o� <br /> • o 0 <br /> ��b. - CITY of ORONO <br /> � ti <br /> '�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��`9kE I��4'�G NO. � � � � <br /> S <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 20, 2000 and <br /> recommended approval on a vote of 5 to 0. <br /> 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br /> A. The structural lot coverage is increasing but is below the allowed 15%. <br /> B. The amount of hardcover in the 75-250' setback area is being reduced <br /> from 5,376 s.f. (29.37%) to 5,368 s.f. (29.33%). ' <br /> C. The addition and deck will not adversely affect the neighbors. <br /> 5. � The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this properry aze peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> � pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properry; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> properry right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br /> and welfare of the community. <br /> " • Page 2 of 6 <br />