My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Big Island
>
650 Big Island - 22-117-23-31-0035
>
Land Use
>
05-2461, SUBD
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2026 3:11:46 PM
Creation date
1/29/2026 3:09:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Department Approval: Administrator Approval: <br />Name: Michael P. Gaffron 4,,,.~ <br />Title: Planning Director 1JV ~ <br />Date: April 21, 2005 <br />Item No.: <br />Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #2461 William and Thelma Bryson & James A. R. Johnson <br />650-660-670-680 Big Island <br />-Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement <br />-Further Extension of Effective Period of Approval <br />Zoning District: RS -Recreational Seasonal District <br />List of Exhibits <br />A Extension Resolution for Adoption <br />B Letter of Request 4-19-05 <br />C Resolutions No. 4 794 and 5246 <br />Application Summary: Applicants request extension of the lot line rearrangement approval granted <br />April 22, 2002 via Resolution No. 4 794, which initially expired in April 2003 and which was extended <br />to April 22, 2005 via Resolution No. 5246 adopted November 8, 2004. The approval allowed 4 <br />'Record Lots' on Big Island to be divided and combined to result in just 2 final lots. The applicants have <br />been unable to complete the filing due to various legal proceedings, and request a further 6-month <br />extension to October 22, 2005. <br />Please review the exhibits. The reason last fall for the requested extension is that the subdivision was never <br />filed with the County, because the applicants encountered title issues which were finally resolved last fall <br />but since then there have been other complications as noted in the letter of request, Exhibit B. Our standard <br />boilerplate language required that this subdivision be filed with the County by October 22, 2002. This <br />application was seen by staff as a win-win for the applicants and the City, as it results in new lots that are <br />more conforming in size than the prior layout. The City Attorney has indicated that while no hearing is <br />required to extend the approval, formal Council action is necessary. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of an extension of the effective period of subdivision approval to October 22, <br />2005 per the attached resolution. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Adopt or amend the attached resolution.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.