Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING · HELD APRIL 1 2, 1 993 (*#7) #1783/#1784 DAVID CARLSON, 610 BIG ISLAND - VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -RESOLUTION #3265 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3265 for Applications #1783/#1784 for David Carlson, 610 Big Island, approving a variance to al low a seasonal dwel I ing to be constructed In front of the average setback I ine, and a conditional use permit to al low such construction within the flood plain. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#8) #1785 DAVID CARLSON, 610/620 BIG ISLAND - FINAL SUBDIVISION -RESOLUTION #3266 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3266 for Application #1785 for David Carlson, 610/620 Big Island, approving the plat of Island Pointe. Ayes 4, nays O. (*#9) #1795 LUANN WALTERS, 3800 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -RESOLUTION #3267 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3267 for Application #1795 for LuAnn Walters, 3800 Wayzata Boulevard, granting a conditional use permit for a day care use. Ayes 4, nays O. (#10) #1804 MICHAEL REVIER, 2691 ETHEL AVENUE - VARIANCE -RESOLUTION #3268 Mabusth explained the applicant seeks an average lakeshore setback variance for a proposed house to be located completely in front of the average lakeshore setback I ine, which has been determined based on an adjoining lot that Is platted with a narrow corridor to the lakeshore. The former residence located on the property was also in front of the average setback I ine. She reported Mr. Amundson, the most impacted neighbor, has no concerns. She Indicated that in a recent conversation with Mr. Kauffman, neighboring property owner to the southeast across the narrow corridor lot, that If his house were used to determine the average setback I ine there would be no need for the variance~ Mr. Kauffman had concern about the proximity of the proposed driveway to the lot line, and the applicant has proposed p I anti ngs a I ong the I ot I I ne to screen the drive, The Runk I es, adjoining property owners to the north of the subject lot, are In strong opposition to the project. 3