Laserfiche WebLink
I ' <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 28, 1997 <br />(#3) #2201 ADAMS/FIEGER/ROBB, 570/580/590 BIG ISLAND -PERMIT FOR <br />PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS IN RIGHT-OF-WAY -RESOLUTION NO. 3885 <br />None of the applicants were present. <br />Gaffron explained that three property owners on Big Island, who have adjoining properties <br />separated by a dedicated right-of-way, propose to share a septic system. They initially requested <br />vacation of the right-of-way because part of the replacement septic system was in the right-of- <br />way. Planning Commission did not respond positively to the vacation so the applicants had the <br />site evaluator redesign the system The drainfield is now totally within one of the properties but · <br />they still need a permit to put piping in the right-of-way to connect all three properties to the <br />septic system. Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions noted in the staff <br />memo of April 23, 1997. <br />Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 3885 granting a permit for placement <br />of private sewerlines and a section offence within the right-of-way dedicated within the plat of <br />Pleasant View Lake Minnetonka on Big Island for the owners of property at 570,580 and 590 <br />Big Island. Vote: Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#8) #2222 JOSEPH VOCHKO, 2925 CASCO POINT ROAD -CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT <br />The applicant was not present. <br />Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to table Application #2222 until the applicant is present <br />Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#14) SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 700 SPRING HILL ROAD -EA W <br />Gaffron explained that the EA W had been distributed and comments have been received. <br />Council must take formal action on the need for an EIS by May 9, 1997. Councilhas two <br />options: 1) postpone the decision on the need for an EIS for up to 30 days to obtain more <br />information; or 2) make a positive declaration requiring that an EIS be_prepared, or a negative · <br />that an EIS is not needed. If Council determines they have all the needed information, they can <br />proceed with the decision on the need for an EIS. A formal documentation of the basis for <br />Council's decision must be ma4e, comparirig the impact that may be reasonably expected to <br />occur with the following criteria: <br />9