Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday,July18,2016 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />average lakeshore setback in order to install solar panels on the roof of the existing cabin, per <br />Stafr s recommendation. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />#16-3841 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS, 8: <br />p. -8:20 P.M. <br />tated the proposed ordinance would modify Orono's existing floodplain ordinance to e <br />consistent ·th the National Flood Insurance Program. The NFIP has updated their model or ance <br />recently, and order for someone to be included in the national Flood Insurance Program, e City must <br />adopt floodplain lations by ordinance. Inclusion in the NFIP allows local property o ners to obtain <br />flood insurance, w h may be a requirement of some mortgages. Without insurance, :g perty owners <br />would not be able to r ance their mortgage or purchase a home with a loan. <br />The draft ordinance will rep ce Orono 's existing floodplain regulations and wou incorporate some <br />additional definitions utilized the City but follows the DNR recommended llinance closely. If the <br />Planning Commission recommen approval of the ordinance, it would then e sent to the DNR for their <br />review, followed by City Council re ·ew. <br />Barnhart noted the changes are highlighte <br />2. Page 4, Lines 17-25, additional informatio en included regarding the regulatory flood <br />protection elevation (RFPE). <br />3. Page 9, the two areas that the DNR has ommen ed as optional have been highlighted. The <br />first addition concerns the use of met ds to elevate tructures. The second addition is in regards <br />to alternative elevation methods ot r than the use of 1. Barnhart stated the Planning <br />Commission has the option of 1 ing those two items in he ordinance or to remove them. <br />Planning Staff recommends approv.: . <br />Leskinen noted Page 5, Lines 7-40 under Establishment of Zoning Dist ts, have the letters AE and A <br />and AE highlighted. Les · en asked whether there is any significance to th' highlighting. <br />Barnhart indicated those eas were highlighted so he can discuss those with e DNR so he can have a <br />better understanding the zoning districts. Barnhart stated no changes are be· made to that section . <br />McGrann asked · there is any concern that this will not be completed by Novembe 4 . <br />Barnhart s ted the next step is to forward it on to the DNR. Barnhart stated the chang are relatively <br />that Staff does not anticipate any problems receiving approval from the DNR. <br />does not respond or is not in support of them, he will pull those changes out of e ordinance <br />p to it going to the City Council and that he does not anticipate any problems meeting the ovember 4 <br />eadline. <br />Lemke asked if the optional ones should remain. <br />Page 17 of 19