Laserfiche WebLink
• .�- <br /> � O� . <br /> • O O <br /> ��d. - C ITY of ORONO <br /> � F <br /> '� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��`�.kE I3p4�'G NO. �_� � <br /> S <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 19, 2000 and <br /> recommended approval on a vote of 5 to 0. <br /> 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br /> A. The residence was rebuilt in 1988 in its approximate original location <br /> which was already located closer to the lakeshore than the adjacent <br /> properties. <br /> � B. The proposal will not result in increases of structural or nonstructural <br /> hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone above that were approved in 1997 ' <br /> per Resolution #2463. <br /> C. The lot is small and narrow for the LR-1B zoning district. <br /> • 5. The City Council finds that no existing views of the lake enjoyed by neighboring <br /> property owners will be impacted by the proposed improvements. <br /> 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other properry in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazazd or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely � <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 7. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and � <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br /> and welfare of the community. <br /> � Page 2 of 7 <br />