My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Big Island
>
520 Big Island - 22-117-23-42-0021
>
Land Use
>
90-1606, CUP
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2026 12:21:34 PM
Creation date
1/27/2026 12:19:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Background <br />Chair Kang and Planning Commission Members <br />Evelyn Turner, City Planner <br />February 16, 2010 <br />Revocation of Conditional Use Permit for Day Use Recreational Area <br />520/530 Big Island (Big Island, Inc., owner) <br />Revocation of Lot Area Variance <br />630 Big Island (Douglas E. Persons et al, owners) <br />520/530 Big Island was granted a conditional use permit for a day use recreation area in <br />August, 1991. A condition of the approval was that a special lot combination agreement be <br />signed to combine the two properties. It was signed but was not recorded by the City. The <br />property owner has not responded to Staffs request to sign a tax parcel combination form or <br />a new special lot combination. If the conditional use permit were revoked and Big Island, <br />Inc. wished to continue using the property for its activities it would need to obtain a new <br />conditional use permit. <br />630 Big Island was granted a lot area variance in September, 1983. As required the property <br />owner signed a tax parcel combination form before the application was processed. But the <br />City did not file the form. The property owner has not responded to Staffs request to sign a <br />new form. Without the lot area variance the property owner could not expand the existing <br />cabin or build a new one unless a new lot area variance was received. <br />It is hoped that the threat of revocation will encourage these property owners to respond to <br />Staffs requests. <br />ACTION REQUESTED <br />A motion to order public hearings for March 15, 2010, to consider revocation of the <br />conditional use permit granted by Resolution No. 3006 and the lot area variance granted by <br />Resolution No. 1540.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.