My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
12-08-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2026 10:06:34 AM
Creation date
1/27/2026 9:56:06 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
370
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
N <br />3. Conflicts between amateur operators r�egaraIng radio antennas and <br />local authorities regarding restrictive ordinances are common. The amateur <br />operator Is governed by the regulations contained In Part 97 of our rules. <br />Those rules do not Ilmlt the height of an amateur antenna but they require, <br />for aviation safety reasons, that certain FAA notification and FCC approval <br />procedures must be followed for antennas v;hich exceed 200 feet in height <br />above ground level or antennas which are tn be orected near airports. Thus, <br />under FCC rules some amateur antenna support structures require obstruction <br />marking and lighting. On the other hard, local municipalities or governing <br />bodies frequently enact regulations limiting antennas and their support <br />structures in height and location, e.g. to side or rear yards, for health, <br />safety or aesthete considerations. These limiting regulations can result <br />In conflict because the effectiveness of the communications that emanate <br />from an amateur radio station are directly depenaent upon the location and <br />the height of the antenna. Amateur operators main+ain that they are <br />precluded from operating in certain bands allocated for tielr use If the <br />height of their antennas is limited by a local ordinance. <br />4. Exampies of restrictive local ordinances were submitted by several <br />amateur operators In this proceeding. Stanley J. C1chy, San Diego, <br />California, noted that in San Diego amateur radio antennas come unc;er a <br />structures ruling which limits building heights to 30 feet. Thus, antennas <br />there are also limited to 30 feet. Alexander Vrenios, Mundelein, Illinois <br />wrote that an ordinance of the Village of Mundelein provides that an antenna <br />must be a distance from the property line that is equal to one and one-half <br />times its height. in his case, he is limited to an antenna tower for his <br />amateur station Just over 53 feet in height. <br />5. John C. Chapman, an amateur living in Bloomington, Minnesota, <br />commented that he was not able to obtain a building permit to Install an <br />amateur radio antenna exceeding 35 feet In height because the Bloomington <br />city ordinance restricted "structures" heights to 35 feet. Mr. Chapman said <br />that the ordinance, when A r itten, undoubtedly applied to buildings but was <br />now being applied to antennas in the absence of a specific ordinance <br />regulating than. There were two options open to him if he wanted to engage <br />In amateur communications. He could request a variance to the ordinance by <br />way of a hearing before the City Council, or he could obtain affidavits from <br />his neighbors swearing that they had no objection to the proposed antenna <br />Installation. He got the building permit after obtaining the cooperation of <br />his neighbors. His concern, however, Is that he had to get permission from <br />several people before he could effectively engage in radio communications <br />for which he had a valid FCC amateur license. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.