My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4405
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 4400 - 4499 (December 13, 1999 - July 10, 2000)
>
Resolution 4405
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2015 12:19:52 PM
Creation date
11/17/2015 12:19:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t <br /> i <br /> � O� <br /> • O O <br /> �,. - CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> �,� G'�� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��kESI��4ti�' NO. � � O � - <br /> A RESOLUTION OF INTENT <br /> TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT <br /> WITH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY ' <br /> LOCATED AT 4220 COUNTY ROAD 6 <br /> WHEREAS,the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing <br /> under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and <br /> WHEREAS, Hennepin County has completed an upgrade of County State Aid <br /> Highway No. 6 (hereinafter "Co. Rd. 6") in Orono, which upgrade required the acquisition of <br /> additional right-of-way from property owners abutting Co. Rd. 6; and <br /> WHEREAS,Robert and Julie Hanning are the owners of the property located at 4220 <br /> Co.Rd. 6("the property")from which Hennepin County required the acquisition of approximately <br /> • 23,300 s.f. or approximately 0.53 acres of land for road right-of-way; and <br /> WHEREAS,the Hannings in 1998 requested that the City Council allow the use of <br /> the right-of-way taken by the County as area credit towards the 5-acre minimum lot area requirement <br /> at the time of future subdivision of their property; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Hannings are in litigation with Hennepin County regardi.ng the <br /> value of the property taken for right-of-way; and <br /> WHEREAS, the City of Orono has a financial interest in the outcome of said <br /> litigation because the City is required to pay half of the costs of acquisition of right-of-way for the <br /> , Co. Rd. 6 upgrade project; and <br /> WHEREAS,the value of the land taken for right-of-way is influenced by how the <br /> taking impacts the ability of the property to be subdivided in the future; and . <br /> WHEREAS, it was not the intent of the City of Orono to render the property no <br /> longer subdividable as a result of the taking, assuming that the property was subdividable prior to <br /> the taking; and <br /> • Page 1 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.