My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Big Island
>
540 Big Island - 22-117-23-42-0001
>
Land Use
>
17-3980, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2026 2:21:17 PM
Creation date
1/22/2026 2:19:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 20, 2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Council <br />Exhibit C <br />#17-3980 <br />3. #17-3980 SHAWN WISCHMEIER, 540 BIG ISLAND, AFTER-THE-FACT VARIAN CE, <br />7:05 P.M. -7:25 P.M. <br />Shawn Wischmeier, Applicant , was present. <br />Curtis stated the pennit for the new home under construction was issued in May of 2017 . Due to the <br />remoteness of the Big Island property and winter weather approaching, the applicant made site <br />preparations , brought materials to the property, and began construction of a 300 square foot shed prior to <br />the issuance of a building pennit this fall. The shed is located 6 . 7 feet from the princip al structure where <br />a l 0-foot setback is required . Construction on the shed has been stopped and the applicant has requested <br />a setback variance . <br />A detailed analysis of the practical difficulties was provided in the Staff report. However, while the <br />applicant has provided a compelling argument supporting the placement of the shed , Staff finds few <br />practical difficultie s exist which support the requested variance beyond that of convenience . <br />To date no public comments have been received . <br />Planning Staff recommends denial of the variance. As the shed is only partially constructed , the applicant <br />should be required to apply for a building permit for the shed and move it to a conforming location. <br />Thie sse asked if there wa s a foundation previously there . <br />Curtis indicated the foundation on the survey depicts the existing foundation. <br />Thiesse asked if the shed is on frost footings . <br />Curtis indicated it is. <br />Shawn Wischmeier, Applicant , stated the floor of the shed or garage structure was part of the cabin <br />building permit, which is why it is there . Wischmeier stated the reasons he is here is because he is asking
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.