Laserfiche WebLink
Summary <br /> Vacant lots have inferior privileges; referenced as vacant lot in legal documents, IRS <br /> forms, lending,purchase agreements etc. <br /> I submit the relevant discussion that lines up with Big Island comp plans,the two dock <br /> permits, easements; historical use, City ordinances, LMCD regulations, and intent of all <br /> exclude a vacant lot. <br /> Is the City responsible to secure docks for remaining five vacant lots with no precedent? <br /> Did applicant deliver data, intent or material facts to support vacant lots qualify for a <br /> dock/permit? <br /> Did applicant deliver any valid data to support vacant lots qualify for a dock/permit,to <br /> encroach, impose intent and conditions to police#2038 in good standing to 230? <br /> Although precedent is set on#2038; #4465 also states inland properties. 220 was split off <br /> but had a structure.Perhaps more flexible but also restricted for use to an inland property. <br /> With no precedent set on Big Island for vacant lots with no lakeshore I submit it does not <br /> qualify. The two existing permits retire from requests to revoke/share. It was proven all <br /> inland properties have use of a dock. City approved easements that resolve future issues. <br /> I respectfully ask Council to deny Mr. and Mrs. Thull's application for a dock noting on <br /> record for future reference the problems,hardships, and precedent set in writing on#2038 <br /> as a historical unique situation to 230 BI. <br /> Thank you for your consideration,patience and understanding with efforts invested. <br /> Nancy L Fames <br /> 230 Big Island <br /> 612-272-6611 <br /> CC: City planners, Council and Mayor <br /> Notified property owners at BI <br /> Page 2 <br />