My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Big Island
>
480 Big Island - 23-117-23-32-0062
>
Land Use
>
LA21-000017, CUP
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2026 12:14:19 PM
Creation date
1/22/2026 12:13:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council <br /> Exhibit D <br /> AGENDA ITEM <br /> AiLOA10. Item No.: # Date: 12 April 2021 <br /> Item Description: #LA21-000017,Joseph&Sara Thull,480 Big Island, <br /> Permit for Dock on City ROW(Bay Place) <br /> ti� �:� Presenter: Melanie Curtis Agenda Planning Department <br /> `�kESHO � Planner Section: Report <br /> 1. Purpose. This application is regarding a permit to place a private dock on city right-of-way on <br /> Big Island. <br /> 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on February 8th and considered <br /> to be complete on February 16th. Therefore the initial 60-day review timeline has been extended, <br /> and the review period now expires on June 16,2021. <br /> 3. Background. The applicants own 480 Big Island,a non-lakeshore property on Big Island. <br /> Pursuant to City Code Section 78-567,the applicants request approval to place a private dock on <br /> the right-of-way(Bay Place). Big Island is zoned RS,which is the only district where a non- <br /> lakeshore property is permitted access to the lake;the city may issue a permit for a dock in the <br /> right of way, or the property owner may obtain an easement over private property. <br /> 4. Summary. The layout of Big Island includes a system of platted,undeveloped city rights-of-way <br /> including some that terminate at the lake shore.The rights-of-way are utilized for pedestrian <br /> access throughout the island, for access to inland properties,and for property owners to receive <br /> delivery of materials and services where access from the lake is challenging(i.e. septic pumping <br /> and installation).The city does not maintain the rights-of-way and the clearing of vegetation <br /> beyond what is necessary to support pedestrian access is not supported or permitted.The majority <br /> of properties owned on the island are lakeshore properties or,if inland, are owned in kind with a <br /> lakeshore property.The Code provides for those limited number of non-lakeshore,inland lots to <br /> gain access via a private dock installed on a city right-of-way via a permit issued by the City <br /> Council. <br /> Historically,only two dock permits have been issued:Resolution 4456 attributed to and shared by <br /> 220 and 130 Big Island granted in 2000; and Resolution 2038 attributed to 230 Big Island granted <br /> in 1986(both attached as Exhibit D). Until the current application,no other requests have been <br /> approved to staff's knowledge.Council may recall,in 2019,a request for a dock on right-of-way <br /> was made on the western portion of Big Island(#LA19-000086).That property owner had been <br /> historically utilizing an informal easement over a neighboring lakeshore property.As a result of <br /> this request,the City proceeded with a text amendment to the Subdivision Regulations(Chapter <br /> 82)to facilitate the creation of a legal lake access easement only in the RS District;this was <br /> added to the Code in 2020.The text amendment resolved the access issue and that right-of-way <br /> permit request was withdrawn. <br /> 5. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On March 15,the Planning Commission held a <br /> public hearing.During the public hearing a number of comments were provided by the public. <br /> The Commission felt there were a number of outstanding issues requiring further research and <br /> discussed tabling the request.However,following the public hearing the Planning Commission <br /> voted 5-1-1 [5 in favor, 1 opposed(Ressler), 1 abstain(Bollis)] on a motion to deny the <br /> application. <br /> 6. Public Comment. Written comments from the public are attached as Exhibit F. Several <br /> Prepared By: VY1GG Reviewed By:J.Barnhart Approved By: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.