My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Big Island
>
470 Big Island - 23-117-23-32-0072
>
Land Use
>
99-2547, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2026 10:29:53 AM
Creation date
1/22/2026 10:28:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD JANUARY 19, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1627 -CONT. <br />Rowlette felt they should be given the opportunity to review the <br />property prior to making a decision. <br />Cohen stated he would not approve after-the-fact hardcover <br />lnstal led within the 0-75' zone, and agreed with Rowlette that they <br />should be allowed to Inspect the property. <br />Chair Bel lows indicated the proposal Is based on an engineer's <br />opinion, not a signed recommendation by a licensed engineer. She <br />felt If this were approve9 they would be allowing a potential for <br />the decks to be rebul It In the future. She felt the deck attached <br />to the residence Is enormous, and she felt that should be reduced <br />to meet the 75' setback. <br />Anderson stated his cl lent would not object to reducing the size <br />of the attached deck. <br />Chair Bellows suggested tabling the application to allow the <br />applicant t,ime to complete the fol lowing: 1) the engineering to be <br />done proper I y , i n c I u d l n g mod I f I cat l on of the re t a I n l n g w a I I s ; 2 ) <br />revise the plans so that any flat area remaining Is not wider than <br />3'; 3) deck attached to cabin to be altered so as not to encroach <br />the 0-75' setback area; and 4) portions of retaining wal Is needed <br />to support decks to be removed.· <br />Johnson asked how much of the retaining wal I system was lnstal led <br />to reta In the s I ope versus how much was bu I It to support the <br />decking. He supported the Idea of retaining the slopes that fel I <br />In from the storm. <br />Anderson stated he could not answer that question. <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Schroeder, to table Appl I cation <br />#1627 for Samuel A. Mccloud, Big Island Record Lot 22, to al low the <br />applicant time to revise his proposal and submit any additional <br />required documents. Ayes 5, nays O. <br />Cha Ir Be I I ows recommended the app I I cant resubm ft h Is proposa I In <br />time for the Planning Commission to visit the property. <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.