My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4532
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 4500 - 4599 (July 10, 2000 - January 22, 2001)
>
Resolution 4532
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2020 3:55:24 PM
Creation date
11/17/2015 11:45:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I � 0 <br /> ON. <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> ,�^�� ~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> `9to-ES� N0. .� a , <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1C, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning <br /> District,where .5 acres or 21,780 s.f. is the minimum lot area. The property consists <br /> of approximately .316 acres or 13,883 s.f. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 18,2000 <br /> and recommended approval by a vote of 7 to 0. <br /> 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br /> A. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone will not change as a result of the addition. It <br /> will remain at 24.1%, below the allowed 25%. <br /> B. The average lakeshore setback variance is justified by the conclusion that <br /> existing views of the lake enjoyed by neighboring property owners will not <br /> be encroached upon by the proposed addition. <br /> C. Lot coverage on the property will increase to 13%, meeting the standard 15% <br /> limitation. <br /> D. The residence was built prior to current zoning standards. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br /> it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br /> the variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicants,but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrabl,. hardship <br /> or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; <br /> and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br /> Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City Staff, comments by <br /> the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.