My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-2025 - Minutes - Planning Commission - PC minutes Nov
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2025
>
11-17-2025 - Minutes - Planning Commission - PC minutes Nov
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2026 10:02:00 AM
Creation date
1/21/2026 10:01:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Minutes - Planning Commission
Section
Planning Commission
Subject
PC minutes Nov
Document Date
11/17/2025
Retention Effective Date
1/21/2026
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes <br />Planning Commission Regular Meeting <br />Monday, November 17, 2025, 6:00 PM <br />City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 <br />Betsy Nusbaum, 3480 North Shore Drive, indicated the neighbor's supported improvement at the site but <br />strongly oppose changes that support industrial use, and sought a requirement that the County be required <br />to adequately manage the site and remove garbage. They are also concerned about parking that impinges <br />on their own property and lakeshore access. She had a letter with 40 signatures. <br />Gabriel Jabbour, 985 Tonkawa Rd., said he believes in public and recreational access as the State <br />Constitution designates water as public. However, he called the proposed plan the vision of one man and <br />over -ambitious and over -reaching. The trees that are proposed to be removed serve as a sound and visual <br />buffer. He also expressed concern about commercial and industrial use, which makes it a dangerous <br />situation for the public who wants to use the access. Jet ski and boat rental also use the site, and boats are <br />being repaired, fueled, and having oil changed at the launch. He said the garbage is not controlled <br />adequately by the County, and he carries a pitchfork in his vehicle to clean up around the dumpster. The <br />County needs to provide another launch site for commercial and industrial uses. <br />Amy Herman, 3825 Cherry Ave., noted this is a big issue for the neighborhood. She said the plan is not <br />ready. She supports recreational use but would want to make sure the ADA lift is maintained and that the <br />other governmental agencies have the opportunity to weigh in. She called the parking lot expansion and <br />lighting excessive. <br />Kristi Anderson, 1408 Baldur Park Rd, is concerned about light pollution in her backyard and traffic <br />entering and exiting, and safety for people putting in canoes and paddleboards. She said the site accesses <br />a narrow and crowded channel. The County's other launch in Spring Park is appropriate for commercial <br />use. <br />Eric Evenson, Executive Director of the Lake Minnetonka Association and a former planner with another <br />city, said the association supports a better recreational and handicapped access at the North Arm launch, <br />but some of the proposed changes have implications lake -wide. He contended that there are DNR, federal <br />grant funding, and Three Rivers policies limiting commercial access and that the City does have a great <br />deal of latitude when a variance is requested. He does not see anything in the plan that would reduce the <br />non -conformity or anything that supports a practical difficulty. Actual problems at the site can be <br />addressed without variances. There are no advantages to the City in vacating the easement. Mixing <br />recreational and commercial/industrial use creates opportunities for conflict and accidents. He discussed <br />the criteria for an attractive nuisance and said mixed use would put the City and the County at risk for <br />liability. <br />Ritchie Anderrson, 3205 Crystal Bay Rd, said the North Arm ramp has turned into a war zone with the <br />amount of traffic and conflicting uses. He also mentioned the garbage problem and the lack of control <br />from the County, along with the expectation that Orono Police control the site. He also said the City <br />should not consider vacating its easement. <br />Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. <br />The commission asked additional questions of the Hennepin County representatives, including an <br />explanation of the lighting plan, community outreach, licensing requirements, and plans to re-establish the <br />tree buffer. <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.