Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
�� <br /> �— . <br /> /� �11�' <br /> � O O <br /> ���� - CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> �� G'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��sxo4� rvo. � 4 � 0 � <br /> 2. This property is located in the RR-1 A Zoning District,where 5 acres is the minimum <br /> lot area. The properiy consists of approximately 4.8 acres allowing a 2,000 s.f. <br /> oversized accessory building and a total aggregate of 4,000 s.f. for all accessory <br /> buildings on the property. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 17, 2000 and <br /> , recommended approval by a vote of 3 to 2. <br /> � 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br /> . A. The property is located in the 5 acre "rural" area of the City along County <br /> Road 6 and Orchard Park Road. There are two adjacent residential <br /> � properties. Neither of the buildings would be fully visible to adjacent <br /> properties,and would not be visible to the properry to the south based on the <br /> mature trees between the lots. The house, across Orchard Park Road, is <br /> . blocked from view to much of the applicant's property by mature trees along <br /> the road. <br /> B. Relocating the garage to another portion of the property would not be <br /> possible without replacing the septic system, which is depicted on the site <br /> survey. The existing system has been determined to be non-compliant due <br /> to the 3' separation to the water table, however it is not required to be . <br /> replaced unti12010. Additional testing has been completed to locate a future <br /> primary and secondary site on the west side of the property. <br /> C. Staff has confirmed the location of the septic tanks and drainfield restrict the <br /> , property from allowing construction of a pole barn behind the house. South <br /> of the drainfield,the property drops off and is very low,the water table and <br /> drainage would be a concern. This would.also require extensive regrading <br /> and construction of a very long driveway to the rear of the property. <br /> D. The existing drive would provide access to the pole barn. This does require <br /> the removal of a two stall garage which has recently been renovated with a <br /> new roo£ I <br /> • Page 2 of 6 <br />