Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL NEETIIIG HELD OCTOBER 27, 1986 <br />#1013 STEVE RATAINEN <br />3850 SHORELINE DRIVE <br />FINAL APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN <br />Steve Katainen was present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhaldson explained the plan which <br />was conceptually approved by the Council on April 14, <br />1986. Applicant has fulfilled all requirements. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the only <br />outstanding concern was the type of outside lighting <br />proposed. <br />Mr. Katainen stated that he proposes a light above each <br />of the 3 side windows in the portico, 1 coach light on <br />each side of the door ar-1 a light above the door, spot <br />lights on the building facing the parking lot. He <br />stated the type of lighting for the sign has not yet <br />been determined. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that the spot lights <br />should be directed to shine down. She stated that She <br />feels assured that staff and Mr. Katainen can work <br />together on the appropriate lighting. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by <br />Councilmember Adams, that the Council approve the final <br />and amended commercial site plan and preliminary <br />building plans for Stephen Katainen for a proposed <br />furniture store on the property located at 3850 <br />Shoreline Drive, subject to staff approving the <br />lighting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />#1.064 CITY OF ORONO <br />SPATES AVENUE - LIFT STATION <br />CONDITIONAL USE PER141T <br />City Administrator Bernhardgon reviewed the issue <br />regarding the requirement for conditional use permits <br />for lift stations, an ordinance that has been on the <br />books since at least 1968, however the City has never <br />previously filed a formal condtional use permit <br />application for construction of a lift station. When the <br />issue was raised this year, staff had two courses of <br />action to recommend to Council: <br />a) obtain an after -the -fact conditional use permit; <br />b) request an ordinance amendment to delete a <br />requirement never utilized. <br />Staff chose the former as it felt that location review <br />of such facilities is appropriately a land use issue. <br />5 <br />