11-10-1986 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

To: Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Admir—str-'-or Date: October 15, 1986 Subject: #1060 J.F. Fleischhacker, 2775 S:ladywood Road - Variance - Second Review Additional Exhibits - Revised Deck Plan - Revised Deck Plan With Staff Notations - Letter of Explanation Discussion: Mr. Fleischh�.�ker has revised his deck plans as directed by the Planning Commission at your August 18th meeting. 75' Setback Encroachment Avg. Setback Encroachment 0-75' Existing Hardcover 0-75' Proposed 75-250' Existing (6,253 75-250' Proposed Original Proposal 2 0 ' 10' (10 s.f. or 0.1%) 276 s.f. (3.7%) s.f. or 38.1%) J,268 s.f. (38.1%) Revised Proposal 9.5' 0' 177 s.f. (2.4%) 6,275 s.f. (38.2%) As you can se,.: from the numbers and the drawing provided, the magnitude of encroachment into the 75' zone has been reduced substantially. The wide dash line shows the original proposal. (Note that staff's numbers reflect the 75' setback line a little bit nearer the house than the applicant's representation, based on the survey.) Staff Recommendation: The hardcover numbers include all of the decking, hence if a varia:.:e is granted for the revised proposal, staff recommends that the variance include the decks as hardcover. Mr. Fleischhacker expressed a concern about the Y" spacing r-`' ted to walking on it with spike high heels. Staff suggests .o reduce t spacing to 1/4" but use more,narrower boards to maintain the maximum 12:1 board -to -space ratio, i.e. use 3" boards will"' 1/4" spacing, or 2" boards with 1/6" spacing (if a variance is granted f the hardcover, then the spacing won't be a fact•.c r - especially since mos, of the deck is over concrete patio anyway). If Planning Commission feels that the revised deck proposal is justified given the facts presented, then a recommendation for approval would be in order, :Waking findings supportive of the recommendation. //