My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-10-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
11-10-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2026 2:34:00 PM
Creation date
1/20/2026 2:22:46 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
398
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />B) The neighbor whose view's would be most affected by the <br />average lakeshore setback encroachment, John Kust of 3355 <br />Crystal Bay Road, has submitted a letter of non -objection <br />regarding the addition. <br />C) The existing residence is located 77 feet from the <br />lakeshore. The majority of the proposed additon in the 0- <br />75' setback zone is over existing driveway hardcover. Any <br />comparably sized addition located in the west side yard <br />would result in the need for even more hardcover than is <br />proposed now. hence the proposed location creates a <br />relatively minimal hardcover increase on the property. <br />D) Existing hardcover <br />the roadway, is 1,152 <br />is gravel driveway. <br />east of proposed porch <br />portion of deck which <br />area, resulting in no <br />zone. <br />in the 0-75' setback zone, excluding <br />s.f. or 41.9%, the majority of which <br />The portion of the driveway located <br />can be removed to compensate for the <br />will be over existing grassed yard <br />net hardcover increase in the 0-75' <br />4. The City Council has considered this application including <br />the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, <br />reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect <br />of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the <br />community. <br />5. The City Council finds that the conditions e: ting on this <br />property are peculiar to it and do not apply gene --ally to other <br />property in this zoning district; that granting the variance <br />would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other Ganger to neighboring property; would <br />not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br />necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br />necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the <br />applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of <br />the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.