Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1076 <br />September 10, 1986 <br />Page 2 <br />Note that Tract 1 is proposed at slightly under 2 acres (1.966 <br />acres or 98.3%). The division was proposed as it is to make use of <br />existing corner pins and to create parallel lot lines on Tract 2. <br />This does mean that Tract 1 technically requires a lot area variance, <br />which is not a common practice, although the density is still 2+ acres <br />for the division. The alternative is to make Tract 1. larger by moving <br />the west line of Tract 2 east about 4 � feet. Measured parallel to <br />County Road 6, Tract 2 will still have a width of just over 2001. <br />Staff would rather see this line moved than to try to gain area from <br />Tract 3 by moving the south line of Tract 1, since this might cause an <br />encroachment on the existing drainfield of Tract 3. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends approval subject to moving the west line of <br />Tract 2 easterly so that Tract 1 will mef_t the 2.0 acre area standard, <br />and subject to septic testing for Trac'- 2 be submitted and approved <br />prior to Council review of the applica;A on, finding that under these <br />conditions the proposal meets all lot standards of the RR-lB zone. <br />r-4-1;" o,_- Z is <br />'" <br />21) <br />j r- <br />