My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-27-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
10-27-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2026 10:48:49 AM
Creation date
1/20/2026 10:42:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
246
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PIANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986 <br />J64 CITY OF ORONO CONTINUED <br />questionably legal because the operation did interrupt <br />for more than 12 months after it became a legal non- <br />conforming use. Ile stated that is a bad use of the <br />property that has not been operated according to its <br />conditional use permit and the City has consistently <br />refused to force the operator to correct the problems. <br />Ile submits that the appropriate answer to the lift <br />station would have been for the City to condemn the <br />entire property because the yard cannot be reduced in a <br />substandard lot, to tear down gas station and remove all <br />that hardcover, and place the lift station more than 50' <br />from the Crear residence and other properties. He <br />stated that every lift station that does not meet the <br />code conditions should be subject to an application and <br />should be denied or granted on its own merits, not <br />because its already there noting that the only issue of <br />replacement is financial which is not a valid hardship. <br />He further stated that he felt the process in which the <br />City followed in placement of the lift station was <br />deceptive and not in the open. <br />Dan Crea=, 1980 Spates Ave., stated that the City has <br />been negligent in notifying him regarding the placement <br />of the lift station and other matters such as t:he recent <br />blacktop on his property to solve a drainage problem. <br />He stated that the lift station was so visibly close <br />(15' from property line, 40' from house) to his house <br />and interferes with his already limited view of the lake <br />and that he is opposed to any more decoration of the <br />lift station. He noted that the sewer and lift station <br />issue has affected him considerably because he is not <br />able to sell his house for a reasonable amount in <br />addition to problems involving the actual hookup from <br />his house to sewer. <br />LaDean McWilliams, 1130 Willow Drive, noted that it <br />costs the Crystal Bay residents an additional $5,000 to <br />change the location of the lift station from Rovegno's <br />property to the present location, and that the City <br />approved this without a public hearing. <br />c I I, <br />No onevwas present from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing, was closed. <br />McDonald asked if is was possible to relocate the lift <br />station up on the City office property. <br />Consulting Engineer Mike Lynch stated it would require <br />another lift station noting issues of the extreme depth <br />of the existing gravity sewer. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.