10-27-1986 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

102186.2 Mayor and City Council CCT2�,gC6 Mark Burnhardson, City Administrator1�� '_V€j DATE: October 21, 1986 y. SUB.Mr-T: ' cilities Study - Consultant Analysis ISSUE - At this junction of the facilities study does the Council feel it appropriate to: A. Hire outside consultant to perform parts of the study B. What it, s does Council ire to authorize to study C. Is it ap, �opriate to have the City's contra c. engineering firm to do the work or does the Cc .1 desire alternate proposals from other vendors DISCUSSION --'tached is the requested detail outline of the vaLious )s she study that the consultant would undertake to deters he :ity's spice needs together with determining alterr .)st arrangemer..s ba; : on preliminary design sketches. As note to :;f the proposals C )eo. include a complete review of the existing builaings however as noted they do not feel th::t the entire code compliance rr.view is appropriate given their prom' ' - , nary review of the t i ldings. At this point in the facilities study and given the r-1t,.re of total project since this is under $9,000 it is ataff's recommendation that the work be done Ly the City's consulting engineer and that should the C=ty yet to the point that they want to do further design work it at that point it be placed for request proposals from addi'- ' .,al firms. RECOMMENDATION - It is stair's recommendation that the following items be contracted with the City's consulting A. Space program study $l,f u. B.2 Adaptation and Re -use - current `,cilities $1,800. C. New Public Works building on City owned is .o $1,8r)q. D. C(.;rnbined City ':all/Public Works - new site 51,800. $7,200. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by , to direct the City' � --�sulting engineer to undertake items A, B.2, C and D as the ne.. step in the City's facilities st .dy. Ayes _ , Nays 1