Laserfiche WebLink
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT M <br />W/12/81 No <br />I <br />public sewer facility in conflict with an approved <br />regional mechanisms are not oriented toward <br />local comprehensive sewer plan or a metropolitan <br />enforcement or implementation, but rather <br />r` <br />sewer plan." A widespread, unanticipated failure of <br />toward review and comment on local actions <br />J <br />on -site systems could necessitate the construction <br />and providing assistance. <br />of a public facility meeting that standard. <br />� <br />-- Most management and control activity has been <br />On -site systems have been widely used in the <br />and continues to be performed by local govern - <br />Metropolitan Area. A substantial proportion of <br />mental units and individual system owners. <br />recent residential construction has occurred in <br />the Rural Service Area. It is estimated that over <br />— Existing local management and control programs <br />'involve <br />60,000 units are in use in the Metropolitan Area <br />are extremely varied in scope, degree of - <br />at present, and data indicates that about 12 percent <br />ment and content. Questions exist about the <br />of all new homes built in the Metropolitan Area <br />adequacy of local administrative capabilities, <br />from 1970 through 1979 rely on on -site systems <br />local ordinance provisions and financial resources <br />for waste disposal. The percentage has declined <br />necessary to carry out a management and <br />since the mid- 1970s. <br />control program in a cost-effective fashion. <br />Despite the widespread use of on -site systems in <br />— Management and control of on -site systems are, <br />the Metropolitan Area, relatively few studies have <br />to a degree, oriented toward dealing with crisis <br />investigated the impacts of on -site systems in this <br />or problem situations, with attention given such <br />Region. General information is available on <br />systems primarily when problems occur. <br />technical engineering and design of such systems, <br />suitable soil and hydrological conditions for on -site <br />— Although federal, state and regional involvement <br />systems, how and why systems fail, and the long- <br />is increasing in management and control <br />and short-term effects of system failure on water <br />programs (as evidenced by WPC 40 and Section <br />quality. This information is beginning to be used in <br />208 of the Clean Water Act amendments), there <br />the Metropolitan Area in a systematic manner. <br />is still uncertainty about what specific responsi- <br />Additional analysis, planning and program <br />bilities the various levels of government should <br />development should relate this general information <br />have. There also is a need to establish adequate <br />to the specific conditions in the Metropolitan <br />enforcement standards for this Region. <br />Area, to the incidence and pattern of on -site <br />system use, and to the adequacy of local on -site <br />— The Metropolitan Land Planning Act, the Metro - <br />system management and control programs. <br />politan Significance regulations, and Section 208 <br />of the Clean Water Act amendments are a help - <br />In the past, local units have typically allowed and <br />ful basis to define an adequate on -site system <br />supervised the installation of on -site systems with <br />management and control program for local <br />little, if any, guidance. Frequently, an informal <br />governmental units. The Land Planning Act also <br />review and approval of installation occurs as <br />establishes mechanisms for local -metropolitan <br />part of the building permit issuance process. Local <br />coordination. <br />supervision, in part, has been based on the model <br />local code for on -site systems first published by <br />— The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency <br />the State Department of Health in 1960. <br />(MPCA) is the lead state agency in dealing with <br />on -site systems. The Minnesota Department of <br />More recent studies and reports confirm the <br />Health also has authority for on -site systems <br />following find s: <br />as they affect drinking water quality. The MPCA <br />,has adopted the first statewide regulations for <br />— Nearly every level of government involved has <br />on site systems. This represents a significant <br />legal ability to implement a more comprehensive <br />step forward in establishing technical and design <br />0 <br />management and control program than exists <br />now. <br />standards for such systems and in coordinating <br />state agency efforts involving the Department of <br />Natural Resources (DNH), the state budding <br />— For a variety of reasons (primarily because of <br />code, the Department of Health, etc., in <br />the traditional local role of exercising police <br />the Region. The regulations, however, directly <br />power over on -site systerns), existing state and <br />control only larger -scale on -site facilities or <br />21 <br />