Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF A PLANNING CCNVISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 17, 1977 - PAGE 5 <br />Members Pesek and Hosfield make up a committee to review PLATTING ORDINANCE <br />the ordinance and to try and make it more compatible. niey <br />will be studying the areas that they feel should be <br />addressed such as current replatting, roads, utility easements, <br />etc. <br />The Planning Commission took action on the following work <br />session item: <br />Mr. Muhich presented revised plan of a similar request that <br />was made last summer and conceptually approved by Council. <br />Air. Hanson was not thoroughly satisfied with the original <br />proposal. Revised plan ilidicates a lakeshore setback of <br />431. Mr. Steve Wilensky, the engineer from Brauer F, <br />Associates was present. He stated that Mr. Hanson would <br />like to move the location of the residence closer to the <br />top of the hill so that there is not quite as much of an <br />overhang. They felt the middle location as shown on the <br />plans is a compromise. Commission felt this was a reason- <br />able request because of the topography of the area. <br />Dunlap moved, Pesek seconded, to accept the middle site <br />plan indicating a 43' lakeshore a;tback subject to <br />previous agreement and stipulations to include the com- <br />bination of the south 30' of Lot 71 and Lot G, and a <br />conservation easement on Lot 3 and the other strip as set <br />forth inpr - ' ,.s resolution. Motion - Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />Jim McCleary arrived at 9:45 p.m. Commission informed him <br />that this item had been discussed earlier and tabled, but <br />that they would continue to discuss it at this time. The <br />Zoning Administrator once again stated that j'4r. NL-Cleary's <br />original request was to remove all existing structures and <br />replace them with one new structure of equal aggregate <br />area for continuing present use which includes a Conditional <br />Use Permit for the serving of soup and sandwiches. In the <br />meantime, the structure has burned down and the property <br />has lost its legal, non -conforming use as more than 75% of <br />the structure was destroyed. The only way to continue this <br />use would be through rezoning or an amendment to the code. <br />Stubbs Bay Marina is currently in a B-2 zone i:aiich permits <br />the operation of a marina in this area, but does not allow <br />for a restaurant. <br />Mr. McCleary stated that Stubbs Bay Marina w.is an existing <br />operation long before he purchased it and the zoning has <br />changed sine- the original use. <br />Commission was not in favor of rezoning. General feeling is <br />that this could result in problems with other marinas and <br />possibly generate more traffic. Also could he more problems <br />with hardcover and generally set a precedent. Iv1iile the <br />Planning Commmission was sympathetic with Mr. McCleary, they <br />told him that fie is requesting something which is not per- <br />mitted by our codes. <br />GEORGE Hf NSON <br />BIG ISLAND <br />VARIANCE - LOT AREA f, <br />LAKESHORE SETBACK <br />(8221) <br />JAt41ES McCLEARY <br />3445 BAYSIDE ROAD <br />NON-CCNFOR�IING USE <br />(#201) <br />