Laserfiche WebLink
CITY of ORONO <br />Post Office box 66•Crystal flay, Minnesota !'"I'l;1•Municipal Officer+ <br />On the North Shorr o/ Lake Minnetonka <br />January 14. 1988 <br />Robert Posthumus <br />242A Natches <br />Lakeville, MN 55044 <br />Rt: Lots 58 and 59, Morse Island Park - St ,tic Concerns <br />Dear Mr. Posthumus: <br />I have further reviewed the site plan and septic system design for the <br />property on Big Island. In addition, I have discussed various concerns <br />about the system design and layout with Dr. Roger Machmeier of the <br />University of Minnesota Agricultural :xtension Service. Dr. Machmeier is a <br />nationally recognized authority on septic systems and is likely the most <br />knowledgable individual in the State of Minnesota regarding the design of <br />such systems for residential usage. <br />Based on his comments ana a further review of the pertinent <br />ordinances, I would make the following comments and determinations: <br />1. The proposed sign is not acceptab_ as -is because the r ck beds <br />are skewed in relation to the contours and therefore the assimptions <br />used in creating that configuration are not valid. Mr. Parker used a <br />literal interpretation of the codes to create this design but it does <br />not in my opinion fit within the design perameters generally accepted <br />within the industry. <br />2. If this system had been located in the portion of the property <br />containing a percolation test, and if that percolation test had been <br />equivalent to perc test #5 at 11 minutes per inch, the basal width <br />perpendicular to the contour lines would be defined as approximately <br />25' with an additional downslcpe area of 12' required in addition to <br />the approximately 20' downhill area required to maintain the necessary <br />4:1 slope for maintenance purposes. That would have put the ultimate <br />boundaries of the system outside of your property boundaries. <br />3. Given that it was determined that the proposed system would not be <br />acceptable, I then layed out the necessary constraining setbacks for <br />this property to determine if there was any chance that the property <br />could contain a well, a residence structure and a primary and <br />alternate drainfield si`e, given the need for mound systems due to a <br />seasonal perched water table. The limiting criteria are as follows: <br />a) For the structure, setbacks on this lot are 75' from the <br />lake, 30' from either side and 30' from the rear lot line. <br />RI'II-DING A 2ONvING - 473-7337 • ADMINISTRA71 )N t FINANCE -- 473.7358 • NI NI I( %( IRKS - 4737339 <br />AWSSINI <br />