Laserfiche WebLink
eerier of trnl.a) motement resulting <br />the fill raises thch sod e trenAbove the origoirl surtait .e sInldtra <br />uenl w the sud particles. Water lie• <br />lion of the sand filleted effluent m t un into the ttiparsd which <br />latively stagnant as lateral or vertical <br />u%uAll% has the highest i onducti%it-, of all moil horizons It ill. I and <br />oral hydraulic gradients which are <br />2►. "Thus, surfAte seepage of potentially dangerous efflueut is pre <br />rider these conditions is inadequate, <br />vented. Once into the topsoil, the liquid in mote laterally until <br />when this stagnant liquid surfaces in <br />absorbed into the underlying clay subsoil whit to will purify the <br />naideration is the principal justifica. <br />liquid to a high quality water before disthargmg to the ground <br />es within an arbitrary 90 cm (3 feet) <br />water. <br />age system or 1.5 in (5 feet) below <br />Conditions in spring and tall, when natural perched water tables <br />Alth codes. Obser%ations in unlined <br />occur At shallow depth. the different design consicirratiom than <br />74 showed water levels near the soil <br />il.. _e in summer and winter when the water table is lower. Dimen <br />d Almena soils for short periods of <br />s of the seepage t:encli should l,c properly designed its avoid <br />in below the sod surface for w%rr)t <br />.s Igor the perched water table into the fill when the ground water <br />Ater level differed among augerholes <br />s nigh and the Iota) basal area of the mound should lie sufficiently <br />uiy affected by small differences in <br />large to absorb and conduct the effluent downwards through slowly <br />Is were not observe) within 1.50 inpermeable <br />subsoil horizons when the ground water is low. <br />urface in summer and early fall, and <br />Medium sand is used As fill material within the mound. Luamy <br />At that time was at least 15 m (50 <br />sands or sandy IoAms have better filtration properties than sands <br />cords. No water table measurements <br />but their potential for clogging is higher (2). Column studies have <br />Ilow levels are not anticipated since <br />indicated that sands can be very effective as filters, however, and <br />e precipitation as snow and effluent <br />., .: of medium-sized sands is therefore recommended (6). <br />to the soil. The required downward <br />'The design of a mound for a particular site involves five steps. <br />possible in periods without natural. <br />They are (i) sizing of required basal area, (ii) sizing of the absorp- <br />y if loading rates would not exceed <br />lion trenches, (iii) design of the distribution system, (iv) final <br />ng a perched "effluent" table. <br />dimensioning of the mound, and (v) sizing of the dosing, hAfflbet. <br />water table poses a problem that can <br />The basal area of a mound should be large enough for the Linder- <br />i? the perched water can be removed <br />lying soil to absorb the maximum expected daily waste water now. <br />the disposal system can be raised <br />This calculation is based on the KsAt of the lent permeable soil <br />rial, thereby creating an unsaturated <br />horizon below the proposed site for the mound. Methods for tests <br />ich and the seasonally high perched <br />to measure this parameter are reported elsewhere (2). Daily now <br />.lure is explored in this publication. <br />is estimated by using 568 liters/day (150 gallons/dAy) per bedroom <br />in the home served. <br />ORES FOR MOUNDS <br />The second step in the design is to size the absorption system <br />within the mound. The system should consist of one or a series of <br />mound is to provide treatment and <br />small parallel trenches rather than one single absorption bed con - <br />I in a safe and efficient manner in all <br />taining all the distribution laterals. Trenches Are superior than beds <br />, two criteria must be met: (i) con- <br />because they will cause A smaller rise of perched liquid in the top - <br />of the effluent discharged from the <br />soil. A standard trench width (m) of 60 cm (2 feet) is ►ecom• <br />of the effluent through a sufficient <br />mended As follows from Applying the Dupuit-Forchheimer assump. <br />ification before any possible human <br />son for horizontal now applied to the topsoil 13). Figure 3 shows <br />lewater. <br />A schematic crun•sectiun of one-half of a mound on top of a <br />•h these criteria. The fill below the <br />permeable topsoil it h11 cm resting on an "impermeable" subsoil 8 <br />mound acts as a sand filter to purify <br />horizon. Infiltration of effluent from the seepage tied (I. cm/day) <br />ication will increase as the rill thick• <br />results in A rise of the ground water into the topsoil. Below the <br />f 60 cm 112 feet) of sand is sufficient <br />center of the bed. the ground -water level is equal to the depth of <br />o very low levels (21. Much or the <br />the topsoil Iho), below the edge of the beJ the level is h1. 1he <br />OD) and suspended solids (SS) that <br />calculation requires that ground water does not rise into the fill. <br />.f the soil pores in the underlying <br />Trench width (w) is calculated .is 66 cm with Eq. (1I, assuming <br />is important since conductivities of <br />/ - 5 cm/dAy; K - 40 cmlday Isre Fig. I) ho ■ 30 cm, and h i <br />marginal and even slight barriers to <br />25 cm. <br />•nacceptably low levels. In addition. <br />(hot - het) = (/ • tot112K. ill <br />MOUND SURFACE <br />) �trouNo tstul-.� <br />- ORIDIr1AL SOIL SURFACE <br />HIGH <br />a-wouNowarER <br />1 A - rtORItOM <br />0 - MOR1tMf <br />n through a niotind system used to <br />of the Qfsval II4141 in the mound <br />L.rss.sr.w tit in <br />• • 11.11 <br />Mound I Sept :1 <br />Mound 11 Sept ' 1 <br />Hound III Aua 7. <br />Mound 1% "us 71 <br />• <br />This analysis is approximate because (i) the subsoil 8 if nor im- <br />permeable. (if) the wit usually has a slight slope, and (iii) the liquid <br />is not applied as a steady flow but As a dose. However, calculations <br />do indicate the need for small seepage trenches rather than large <br />seepage beds. The total bottom area of the trenches is calculated <br />by using a liquid application rate of 5 cm/day (1.2 gallons/fern per <br />dav) (2). The height of the gravel-ndled trench should be at least <br />^I, tin (8 inchrsl to allow for sufficient liquid storage. If parallel <br />trenches are uses, their spacing is determined by the hydraulic <br />characte:istics of the underlving flibsoil. The area between the <br />trenches should be sufficient to absorb all the liquid contributed toy <br />the upilope trench, and Trenches should be lard parallel to the slope. <br />Ihr design of the liquid distribution system is the next step. <br />I he traditional %%stem using perforated 10 cm (4 inches► diameter <br />tape does nit provide adequate distribution over the entire adsorp <br />live area as is rrquired 12. 4). 'To solve this problem, pressure dis- <br />tnbution %%stems utilizing smaller diameter pope have Bern etc <br />signed. these s%%firms pnwnle uniform distribution ovri the entire <br />trench IHmut.m Are.t .luring rath Apphtarici 1^dust'•) if effluent <br />f41 [hut, .optimal use of the tandtill I% male by a%, Amg hHAI • <br />m erloadig nit As%"i IAttit poor purer it anon And t loa,ftrtg t o ther <br />delaih if three .%%iris Air torig puhlithed rl%rwhrrr <br />• <br />• Numbers in parrothe.,, ode. ale is <br />r Numbers in parentheses incise ate f <br />r Unknown quantJtrs of water from <br />t Hoeoruwnrr damased d"wna tank <br />The fourth step is the fine <br />this can be done an appropria <br />surfaec must be selected. Soi <br />ly perched water tables at 3 <br />several weeks, -ereas high <br />Addition of 6V 2 feet) u <br />would create is distatice <br />of the absorption trenches <br />level. This is tie.--tinimal di <br />codes (8, 9). Mure important <br />to obtain satisfactory purifica <br />The depth of fill r the <br />termined. This should be sufl <br />northern Wisconsin have oper <br />of cover. <br />Side slopes should be stab <br />off. Slopes of 5:1 are rerun <br />cm to 15 cm (4 to 6 inches) c <br />growth of grasses needed to <br />filtration of precipitation. <br />termined the total basal area <br />area computed in the first st <br />than or equal to the Area in it <br />The last step in design is <br />filtering efftceency of the fit: <br />rate. Large mstantAneous app <br />the sand resulting in lea p <br />clogging. Smeller, more freq <br />too small and too frequent I <br />also lead to early clogging. <br />mended and the sire of the t <br />SECTION VIEW <br />PLAN VIEW <br />k no. 3, 1f7S <br />